On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 11:43:22AM +1200, Norbert Murzsa wrote:
> After a successful building I have one running process on RHEL3 and
> RHEL4 but I have three running processes on RH 7.3.
They're not actually three seperate processes - they're three threads in the
same process. Check the man page
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 03:21:51PM -0700, Tracy R Reed wrote:
> sqlite because there is no daemon to make sure is running, no way anyone
> could access it from outside, and it can be set up very quickly. I will
If you're not planning on accessing mysql from a remote machine, you probably
will want
Tested versions (built from source):
1.38.6
1.38.10
After a successful building I have one running process on
RHEL3 and RHEL4 but I have three running processes on RH 7.3.
Everything works fine (the communication is good) but I can’t
understand why are these three processes on RH 7.3
Sebastian Stark wrote:
> As far as I understand the SQLite interface shouldn't be used in
> production environments. You should get better performance by
> switching to MySQL or PostgreSQL.
>
So I switched bacula from sqlite to mysql today.
Elapsed time: 1 hour 12 mins 49 secs
Michael Heim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I also think you should change the database backend and make some bonie++
> benchmarks on your storage subsystem. Perhaps it could also be an ethernet
> autoneg proplem (Switch Half/Server Full). Take a look to ethtool.
>
Sqlite isn't recommended for production?
Hi,
I also think you should change the database backend and make some bonie++
benchmarks on your storage subsystem. Perhaps it could also be an ethernet
autoneg proplem (Switch Half/Server Full). Take a look to ethtool.
Some performance data of our bacula installation for comparison:
Supermicr
Am 18.06.2006 um 13:04 schrieb Tracy R Reed:
> Tracy R Reed wrote:
>> Device:tps Blk_read/s Blk_wrtn/s Blk_read
>> Blk_wrtn
>> hda 0.00 0.00 0.00
>> 0 0
>> sda 969.39 146.94 13069.39144
>>
Tracy R Reed wrote:
> Device:tps Blk_read/s Blk_wrtn/s Blk_read Blk_wrtn
> hda 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0
> sda 969.39 146.94 13069.39144 12808
>
> How on earth could it be writing so much more than it is
