On Monday 17 April 2006 01:02, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Kern,
>
> in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > All your reasoning is absolutely perfect up to this previous point. In
> > looking at the Bacula error messages that you list above, it is always an
> > I/O error writing a Bacula blo
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 13:50, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I do not feel that I can adequately support Solaris any longer so will very
> likely drop it from the officially supported platforms.
>
> Why?
> Because I don't have access to a tape drive for Solaris, and I no longer have
> the ti
All-
I have been looking at the Sourceforge page and am confused as to what is the
latest stable release as opposed to an experimental one. If the Sourceforge
format would allow for a simple definitive statement that "Release x.y.z-w is
the latest stable release", it sure would be nice. But I
- Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 16 Apr 2006 at 16:25, RYAN vAN GINNEKEN wrote:
>
> > Hello all i am running bacula-client/server with MySQL on FreeBSD
> 4.11
> > Stable having some difficulty installing the Bacula Web system.
> Here
> > is a list of the installed packages a
Dear Kern,
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> All your reasoning is absolutely perfect up to this previous point. In
> looking at the Bacula error messages that you list above, it is always an I/O
> error writing a Bacula block that produces the problem. Once Bacula gets an
Argh..
On 16 Apr 2006 at 16:25, RYAN vAN GINNEKEN wrote:
> Hello all i am running bacula-client/server with MySQL on FreeBSD 4.11
> Stable having some difficulty installing the Bacula Web system. Here
> is a list of the installed packages and version numbers involved .
>
> apache-1.3.34_4 The ex
Hello all i am running bacula-client/server with MySQL on FreeBSD 4.11
Stable having some difficulty installing the Bacula Web system. Here
is a list of the installed packages and version numbers involved .
apache-1.3.34_4 The extremely popular Apache http server.
bacula-client-1.38.5_1
Kern Sibbald writes:
1. You want *all* data to be encrypted ...
2. You want to control the encryption key(s) on a single machine (SD
encryption)...
When the encryption on the SD is done, does that mean all the processing
time will be spent on the SD side? couldn't that in theory create a
This starts a new subject, related to bacula-web. As such, I've
started a new thread.
On 16 Apr 2006 at 13:30, RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN wrote:
> Thanks Dan for everything my FreeBSD box backup up last night to the
> Fedora core 3 machine that you helped me get working. Feels great to
> have a ful
> > > > > > > > > On 13 Apr 2006 at 15:52, RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hello all i have a fresh install of bacula using
> mysql
> > > > > database
> > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > fedora core 3. I have the following error message
> > > perused
> > > > >
On Sunday 16 April 2006 21:16, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Landon Fuller writes:
> > Using the code in CVS it is possible to encrypt data at the FD, prior to
> > being sent to the Storage Daemon.
>
> Thanks much for the info. Just trying to learn as much as I can both about
> the operational side as w
On Sunday 16 April 2006 20:45, Landon Fuller wrote:
> Francisco Reyes wrote:
> > Michel Meyers writes:
> >> Correct: There's encryption of the communication between the File Daemon
> >> and the Storage Daemon but no encryption of the data as it is written to
> >> tape/HDD/CD/DVD. That's still on th
On Sunday 16 April 2006 20:23, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > Then it sounds to me more like a bacula issue rather than the SCSI tape
> > driver.
>
> I disagree. We get pretty clear SCSI error messages (unexpected
> disconnect). No matter what a user app
On Sunday 16 April 2006 20:37, Cedric Tefft wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >Can you confirm either by testing or from your knowledge of the problem
> > that it does not occur if there are not simultaneous jobs using Python.
> > If this is the case, let me know and I'll work on adding a correct
> >
Landon Fuller writes:
Using the code in CVS it is possible to encrypt data at the FD, prior to
being sent to the Storage Daemon.
Thanks much for the info. Just trying to learn as much as I can both about
the operational side as well as the concepts.
This FD encryption will be (as far as I
Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Michel Meyers writes:
>
>> Correct: There's encryption of the communication between the File Daemon
>> and the Storage Daemon but no encryption of the data as it is written to
>> tape/HDD/CD/DVD. That's still on the todo list.
>
> Ok. Thanks for explanation. Perhaps the d
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Can you confirm either by testing or from your knowledge of the problem that
it does not occur if there are not simultaneous jobs using Python. If this
is the case, let me know and I'll work on adding a correct recursive lock
that allows only one Bacula thread at a time in
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> Then it sounds to me more like a bacula issue rather than the SCSI tape
> driver.
I disagree. We get pretty clear SCSI error messages (unexpected
disconnect). No matter what a user application does, the SCSI driver
must never run into such a s
On Sunday 16 April 2006 11:52, Robert Nelson wrote:
> But I think the behaviour would be very intuitive. If you look at how it
> is used below in the example from the Windows FileSet I think it is fairly
> obvious. I also think it is much clearer and easier to maintain than the
> corresponding re
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
I am more and more convinced that this is a subtel timing issue in
the SCSI tape driver layer.
Or possibly a bad cable/terminator...
No, definitely not. Believe me, I know what I'm doing, and this
wouldn't happen identi
But I think the behaviour would be very intuitive. If you look at how it is
used below in the example from the Windows FileSet I think it is fairly
obvious. I also think it is much clearer and easier to maintain than the
corresponding regex would be. The code change was minimal and didn't
requir
Hello,
As many of you know, the Bacula regex handling uses the regex library routines
that are installed on your OS. This creates a few problems due to the fact
that there are a good number of different regex definitions (Perl, grep, awk,
egrep, Python, ...).
For version 1.38.8, I took grabbed
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > I am more and more convinced that this is a subtel timing issue in
> > the SCSI tape driver layer.
>
> Or possibly a bad cable/terminator...
No, definitely not. Believe me, I know what I'm doing, and this
wouldn't happen identically on
Hello,
Friday, I released the source tar file, the docs, and the Windows binaries for
Bacula 1.38.8 to the Bacula project on Source Forge. Scott has already
released the rpms to Source Forge (thanks Scott), and several of the other
packages are ready or being prepared.
The regression scripts
On Sunday 16 April 2006 00:21, Robert Nelson wrote:
> Couldn't you handle both cases transparently. If the pattern has a "/" in
> it then pass the full name, otherwise just pass the basename to fnmatch().
> That way you get both behaviours without breaking existing examples and
> configs.
>
> Iron
25 matches
Mail list logo
