On Sunday 27 November 2005 06:41, Ross Boylan wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 04:00:59PM -0500, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> > Ross Boylan wrote:
> > > Item x: Deletion of Disk-Based Volumes
> > > Date: Nov 25, 2005
> > > Original: Ross Boylan
> > > Status: Proposal
> > >
> > > What: It would be
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 11:08:50PM +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> We might be able to do something like:
>
> skip job=Job-name
>
> which would skip the next scheduled time for Job-name
>
Leaving aside the somewhat oddball and/or misremembered cases, will
there ever be situations in which mo
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 11:08:50PM +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Friday 25 November 2005 22:32, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > What should we call those things that are scheduled but have not yet
> > run?
>
> Good question. I don't know. Maybe Scheduled Jobs as opposed to Running Jobs.
> This may
If you're playing around with filesets, you may find using bconsole's
"estimate" command is simpler than going through a backup. "estimate
listing" will list each file that would be backed up. More details
in the manual.
Ross
---
This SF.net
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 04:00:59PM -0500, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> Ross Boylan wrote:
> > Item x: Deletion of Disk-Based Volumes
> > Date: Nov 25, 2005
> > Original: Ross Boylan
> > Status: Proposal
> >
> > What: It would be useful to control how long the actual backups were
> > kept for t
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 08:58:19PM +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am forwarding this to the list because it is a very interesting feature
> request (a big project too), and because it is very similar to the request
> submitted by Ross Boylan. My question to Ross and Ray (and others),
Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Backup is a serious issue. Allow me a bit or sarcasm... I know that most
> Windows admins think that all the operating things that whole bookshelfs
> deal with must be as easy as a mouse click. And Windows admins laugh about
> long-bearded UNI
Yup, I feel silly. Forgot to give the mount command. Works fine now.
Thanks,
maria
Ryan Novosielski wrote:
It will not ask to use a tape that is used, so I'm not sure what trouble
you're running into. I'm assuming you are typing 'mount' after loading
the desired tape? I have this happen all
> "Aleksandar" == Aleksandar Milivojevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Aleksandar> It is convinient to have fixed UID/GIDs accross systems.
Aleksandar> For example, the files will have correct ownership when
Aleksandar> moved accross systems (when using UID/GID based archive
Aleksandar> formats
It will not ask to use a tape that is used, so I'm not sure what trouble
you're running into. I'm assuming you are typing 'mount' after loading the
desired tape? I have this happen all the time, and it's never asked me for
a tape that was used.
Incidentally, is Accepy Any Volume enabled?
Hi there,
If bacula recycles a tape (and is then asking for it to be mounted), is
it possible to convince it to use a different tape instead? I tried
switching the tape it recycled status to used, but it doesn't seem to
notice, and it just keeps requesting the original tape. What I would
li
On Friday 25 November 2005 09:39, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Don't use arkeia, and I've heard statements about Legato that were
> similar...
Seconded. We used Arkeia in production at a software development company.
It is pure garbage. Buggy, crappy GUI (became increasingly worse with
every update),
On Friday 25 November 2005 06:22, Harry Putnam wrote:
> I came to learn to use bacula, is it also required to become thoroughly
> proficient with mysql? I know nothing about databases, does that rule
> me out as a bacula user?
Depends on the size of your setup. If you just backup one server and d
Hi,
I am new to Bacula. I am trying to setup it on FreeBSD 5.3 with PostgreSQL
7.2. In PostgreSQL, "path" is a built-in type so "create table path" is
illegal.
What did you do to work around this problem?
Thanks,
John Du
On Saturday 26 November 2005 17:09, Harry Putnam wrote:
> I'm wondering if I'm working my way into a mess by installing
> different version of bacula on windows than on linux.
>
> The latest available build on gentoo linux is 1.36.3 and I see the
> download offered for windows is 1.38.X
>
> So wi
--- Karl Hungus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> http://www.nagios.org
>
Thanks Karl!
Have you ever tried zabbix ? you should, it's a GPL software ;-)
Khalil FOUNDY
__
Lèche-vitrine ou lèche-écran ?
ma
Hi Chris,
Thanks for the offer. I downloaded your code and started playing with
it. I had some problems to generate the Makfile by the main configure
script. It complained about the "depend" target in the Makafile.in. So
I just compiled it by hand and it works great.
Now what are your plans for th
Hi Arno,
--- Arno Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> check_bacula is C code and requires bacula sources to be available
> and
> configured.
I am lloking ito this code right now.
>
> To check the status of actual Bacula jobs, I used a Run After Job
> script
> in Bacula which reports job
I'm wondering if I'm working my way into a mess by installing
different version of bacula on windows than on linux.
The latest available build on gentoo linux is 1.36.3 and I see the
download offered for windows is 1.38.X
So will running a 1.38* file daemon with a 1.36 director be a problem?
-
Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> There appears to be some ongoing confusion with delete vs. purge. I have
> a feeling purge will do what you want. It's the difference between
> deleting on disk data and in catalog data. Am I correct here?
Either way, at present, Bacula will never delete the actual on-dis
http://www.nagios.org
On Nov 25, 2005, at 11:36 AM, Khalil Foundy wrote:
Hi all,
I need your advice about the best way of monitoring bacula using a
script. I am interested in monitoring the deamons, to see if they are
running or not. I am also inetersted to know the status of the
director/stora
Running bacula in single client mode for now so backup jobs consist of
backing up various parts of the host file system.
What is the normal way to handle labels? Seems bacula by default
expects to write to the same label for each different job.
I don't see anything in example *dir.conf that look
Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday 26 November 2005 07:35, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> bacula-1.36.3
>> When one uses the bconsole to delete a volume like the test one
>> created in /tmp, should that volume disappear from the filesystem?
>>
>> I see after deleting with bconsole that
Dominic Marks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> So doing that I entered /etc/ in the slot indicated by the comments.
>>
>> start bconsole and say `run' go thru the steps etc, but it runs the
>> same job as before. Not /etc but some piece of the bacula install
>> directory files. Which don't
On Saturday 26 November 2005 01:13, Harry Putnam wrote:
> I'm just getting started and walking my way thru the manual at the
> `Running a job' part. Went thru it ok, but see nothing here that
> would let me know how to tell bacula what to backup.
>
> If I wanted to experiment a bit how would I tel
On Friday 25 November 2005 21:28, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 25.11.2005 22:00, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> > Ross Boylan wrote:
> >>Item x: Deletion of Disk-Based Volumes
> >>Date: Nov 25, 2005
> >>Original: Ross Boylan
> >>Status: Proposal
> >>
> >>What: It would be useful to control
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 10:05, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Saturday 26 November 2005 09:51, Ove Risberg wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 20:53, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I don't have a problem with the basic feature (in fact it was planned
> > > from the very beginning).
Hi,
I have a Sun Fire V210 server with fcal disks and I can not get more
than 6MB/s from the root filesystem.
On a filesystem with larger files I have seen transferrates of about
15MB/s when using netbackup and multiple filesystems backupped at the
same time. Netbackup does not get any higher tra
On Saturday 26 November 2005 09:51, Ove Risberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 20:53, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I don't have a problem with the basic feature (in fact it was planned
> > from the very beginning). However, this is really not a task for the
> > Director, nor is t
On Saturday 26 November 2005 07:35, Harry Putnam wrote:
> bacula-1.36.3
> When one uses the bconsole to delete a volume like the test one
> created in /tmp, should that volume disappear from the filesystem?
>
> I see after deleting with bconsole that the test volume is still
> present in /tmp.
>
W
Hi,
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 20:53, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I don't have a problem with the basic feature (in fact it was planned from
> the
> very beginning). However, this is really not a task for the Director, nor is
> there any need for multiple simultaneous jobs. Rather, this woul
31 matches
Mail list logo
