Phil Stracchino wrote:
> Sebastian Haas wrote:
> If they changed again today, they should be saved again; otherwise, not.
> However, I don't expect this to fix your main problem; it will only fix
> that "DIR and FD clocks differ" warning.
Okay you are right, this doesn't fixed the problem but the
Hello,
On 30.09.2005 00:01, Bennett, Silas (GE Infrastructure) wrote:
...
BINGO!!!
That is it exactly. The documentation was not clear at all on this. Thank you
very much, I would have never been able to figure that out from the docs.
Is there someplace to issue a bug report against the docum
-Original Message-
From: Phil Stracchino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 1:31 PM
To: Arno Lehmann
Cc: Bennett, Silas (GE Infrastructure);
bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Differentials Jobs referencing obsolete Full
Job
>Arno Le
Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'll put my answer to Phil's post here... it just fits better.
>
> Phil, if he scenario you describe really can happen I think it would be
> time to consider the time stamp stored in the FileSet when looking for
> previous backups. sqlquery follows:
I don't know
Hello,
I'll put my answer to Phil's post here... it just fits better.
Phil, if he scenario you describe really can happen I think it would be
time to consider the time stamp stored in the FileSet when looking for
previous backups. sqlquery follows:
select * from FileSet;
+---+--
Hello,
There are three general topics that I would like to address:
1. The current status of version 1.37 to be released as 1.38.0
2. The next development version (wishlists, projects and such interesting
topics).
3. My current thoughts on donations
Since there is a lot to say, I'll do it i
I'm running FreeBSD 5.4 and using bextract 1.36.3 to restore multiple
tape volumes to a drive I lost. It's giving me the following message:
29-Sep 10:39 bextract: End of Volume at file 16 on device /dev/nsa0,
Volume
"TAPE-0003|TAPE-0004|TAPE-0005|TAPE-0006|TAPE-0010|TAPE-0011|TAPE-0012"
29-Se
Bennett, Silas (GE Infrastructure) wrote:
> The Full backup it is referencing "_IS_" good, but it is old. As a result the
> differentials are much bigger than they need to be. My question is why is it
> referencing an old Good Full backup verses a new Good Full backup?
Well, basically, I can see
-Original Message-
From: Phil Stracchino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 12:50 PM
To: Bennett, Silas (GE Infrastructure)
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Differentials Jobs referencing obsolete Full
Job
>
>Bennett, Silas (GE
>But with tapes you do have the
> simple constraint of "is there really a tape for this?"
>
> Is it possible to constrain bacula to only create volumes when it has a
> blank tape in the drive to label? This whole thing with creating a volume
> that has no physical reality is what confuses me.
T
Sebastian Haas wrote:
>>>As the jobs started I've noticed the following message from the director:
>>>29-Sep 00:52 fileserver01-fd: DIR and FD clocks differ by -730 seconds,
>>>FD automatically adjusting.
>>>
>>>The director started the job at 1:05am while the FD's clock was 00:52.
>>>But I would a
Hi,
I have learned to use and love bacula in it's way of configuration and
working but a tiny problem arose.
Now I have to configure it in a mixed environment (several MacOS X's,
1 linux and 2 Win2K's) with a single Travan tape drive in the linux.
Because of all the issues with its crappy driver a
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 09:37 +0200, Jonas Björklund wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Peter Sjoberg wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to compress the traffic between a windows client (that is
> > connected over vpn) and the (linux) bacula server?
> > Both sides run a late version of the stable 1.
Hello,
Phil Stracchino wrote:
> Sebastian Haas wrote:
>
>>I've did a incremental backup last night and I notice that the backup
>>was bigger than I did assumed.
>>
>>I did then an "bls" to show which files bacula backed up, and the most
>>of the files bacula backed up shouldn't changed to the las
Robert W Hartzell wrote:
> Thanks for your input Phil. This is how I have setup my pools, I think
> this will do what I want. Once I see how many incremental jobs will fit
> a single volume I will adjust the values. Hopefully an entire month will
> fit on one volume so I can minimize tape changes.
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 06:05, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> Robert W Hartzell wrote:
> > I want to retain Full backups 6 months but I'm not sure how long I need
> > to save Differential and Incremental backups.
> >
> > Should I use different pools for each machine or just three pools Full,
> > Diff, an
Sebastian Haas wrote:
> I've did a incremental backup last night and I notice that the backup
> was bigger than I did assumed.
>
> I did then an "bls" to show which files bacula backed up, and the most
> of the files bacula backed up shouldn't changed to the last backup. By
> the way, I did a full
Hello,
Your best bet is to ask the list. They are much better at responding in detail
to these kinds of questions than I am. I've copied the list as you may get
additional help.
Just the same, here are a few quickie answers ...
On Thursday 29 September 2005 13:30, Joe McGuckin wrote:
> Kern,
>
Hello,
the first thing I'd try is, on the client you can't connect to, run he
DIR in the foreground with debug output enabled. That should tell you if
the connections get through to the DIR itself.
If they don't, but the host itself can be reached, it's probably a
firewall issue. You might w
Dear list,
I've did a incremental backup last night and I notice that the backup
was bigger than I did assumed.
I did then an "bls" to show which files bacula backed up, and the most
of the files bacula backed up shouldn't changed to the last backup. By
the way, I did a full back yesterday.
But
20 matches
Mail list logo
