-----Original Message----- From: Phil Stracchino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 12:50 PM To: Bennett, Silas (GE Infrastructure) Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Differentials Jobs referencing obsolete Full Job
> >Bennett, Silas (GE Infrastructure) wrote: >> Is it possible that Bacula's Diff jobs are purposefully not referencing >> a "Good" Full backup because of the mail warning? > >In short, no. Bacula is referencing a Full backup that it believes to >be good; if it's not good, then Bacula doesn't know it isn't. Why this >may be is hard to say at this point. > The Full backup it is referencing "_IS_" good, but it is old. As a result the differentials are much bigger than they need to be. My question is why is it referencing an old Good Full backup verses a new Good Full backup? >What you could try, assuming you have a newer Full backup based on the >same Filesets, is to manually delete the old Full job. This should >either force it to work from the newer Full or, if the more recent Full >was somehow made against a different Fileset than is currently being >used, will force a new Full backup. > I will backup my catalog, and try this. The file sets between the Full and Diff jobs are the same, so I don't think that is the issue. > > >-- > Phil Stracchino [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Renaissance Man, Unix generalist, Perl hacker > Mobile: 603-216-7037 Landline: 603-886-3518 Thank you for your help Phil. ;0) Cheers, Silas ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
