Kern,
This question is probably your bailiwick. In the event of a failed job
in bacula, is there any existing mechanism to tell Bacula to (logically)
erase that job from the tape and treat that portion of the tape as
unused? Logic says it should be basically a simple matter of resetting
VolBytes
Phil Stracchino wrote:
Philipp Steinkrueger wrote:
Phil Stracchino wrote:
Well, there are future features coming that will make much of this
easier, including the copy job (duplicate media), and the migration job
(migrate a job from disk to tape). These would allow you to:
1. Make ful
Philipp Steinkrueger wrote:
> Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> Well, there are future features coming that will make much of this
>> easier, including the copy job (duplicate media), and the migration job
>> (migrate a job from disk to tape). These would allow you to:
>>
>> 1. Make full backup
>> 2. Dupli
Phil Stracchino wrote:
Philipp Steinkrueger wrote:
Okay, i'll try to explain my idea again:
I have two primary goals:
G1: Protect data against burn down of the autochanger location
G2: Be able to restore any data anytime without inserting tapes into the
autochanger
I dont think there are
On Saturday 13 August 2005 16:21, James Ashton wrote:
> Using 1.36.3 at the moment.
OK.
The problem is that you are trying to "mount" two different Volumes at the
same time on a single SD Device. That may sound wrong or odd to you, but
Bacula treats Disk Volumes almost identically to tape Volu
Philipp Steinkrueger wrote:
> Okay, i'll try to explain my idea again:
>
> I have two primary goals:
>
> G1: Protect data against burn down of the autochanger location
> G2: Be able to restore any data anytime without inserting tapes into the
> autochanger
>
> I dont think there are many options
Using 1.36.3 at the moment.
James Ashton
Peering and Network OPS
Vortech Inc
AS32065
-Original Message-
From: Kern Sibbald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2005 10:12 AM
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: James Ashton
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Failing jobs
Hello,
What version of Bacula are you using?
On Saturday 13 August 2005 15:59, James Ashton wrote:
> Hello,
> We are backing up around 130 boxes using bacula. We have a directory box
> with 4 backup servers and are backup up using Files on a 1 large raid array
> for each of these backup servers.
Hello,
We are backing up around 130 boxes using bacula. We have a directory box with
4 backup servers and are backup up using Files on a 1 large raid array for each
of these backup servers.
Each night I gent dozens of failed Jobs. The errors are all similar to:
13-Aug 08:43 backup3-sd: unix3.2
Hello Phil,
On Friday 12 August 2005 20:52, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> Thomas E. Ruth wrote:
> > I havn't been able to automate a restore completely within bacula for
> > DB2 databases, but I've gotten close. The bacula restore process
> > creates a FIFO with only root permissions but doesn't chang
Hi Phil,
I'm not sure I see what you're after here. In general, it would be a
bad idea -- and increase the amount of data to back up -- to make a
differential against anything BUT the latest full backup. I utterly
fail to see how intentionally running a differential against an older
Full backu
11 matches
Mail list logo
