On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 16:01, Peterson Silva wrote:
> Recently I've posted this bug at Launchpad:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/686822
>
> So the thing is, if you have only one instance of an active window and you
> click its icon in the Launcher, the effect is useless.
Hi,
I was doing some work on the snap windows plugin for compiz and I was
wondering if it is the correct behaviour design wise to allow windows
to move underneath the launcher and the panel. Currently we have it so
that windows snap to the launcher but the user can move the window
past the launche
Le jeudi 09 décembre 2010 à 18:55 +0800, Sam Spilsbury a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I was doing some work on the snap windows plugin for compiz and I was
> wondering if it is the correct behaviour design wise to allow windows
> to move underneath the launcher and the panel. Currently we have it so
> that w
On 09/12/10 10:59, Didier Roche wrote:
> Le jeudi 09 décembre 2010 à 18:55 +0800, Sam Spilsbury a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was doing some work on the snap windows plugin for compiz and I was
>> wondering if it is the correct behaviour design wise to allow windows
>> to move underneath the launcher an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
frederik.nn...@gmail.com wrote on 08/12/10 21:24:
>
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 20:57, Roth Robert ...
>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Matthew Paul Thomas
>...
>>> Yes. It is a bug in the HIG that it recommends repeating title bar
>>> text as primary t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peterson Silva wrote on 08/12/10 15:01:
>...
> So the thing is, if you have only one instance of an active window and
> you click its icon in the Launcher, the effect is useless. Users coming
> from Windows 7 (or any other version of it for that matter
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:33 AM, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> On 09/12/10 10:59, Didier Roche wrote:
>> Le jeudi 09 décembre 2010 à 18:55 +0800, Sam Spilsbury a écrit :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was doing some work on the snap windows plugin for compiz and I was
>>> wondering if it is the correct behaviour
On 09/12/10 17:43, Sam Spilsbury wrote:
> My idea was this:
>
> 1) On the intellihide case:
> [...]
> -> When resizing a window, if the resize border touches the launcher,
> it goes away, easy
I'd like to see a proximity "push" in this case. When the window is
brought "close" to the launcher, we s
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> On 09/12/10 17:43, Sam Spilsbury wrote:
>> My idea was this:
>>
>> 1) On the intellihide case:
>> [...]
>> -> When resizing a window, if the resize border touches the launcher,
>> it goes away, easy
>
> I'd like to see a proximity "push"
Lovely concept. I think it would make positioning windows near the
launcher less frustrating.
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 18:14 +, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> On 09/12/10 17:43, Sam Spilsbury wrote:
> > My idea was this:
> >
> > 1) On the intellihide case:
> > [...]
> > -> When resizing a window, if
Frederik,
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:53 AM, frederik.nn...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> well, this is what i've been waiting for all along:
> professional post production software for Ubuntu!
Music to my ears. :)
For anyone who missed earlier emails, discussion is about this pro
file import U
"That's what it does in Windows 7, for some applications but not others:
for example, it works for Windows Explorer, but not for Windows Backup."
What an inconsistency oO
"It's not what it does in Mac OS X, at all:"
Sorry, I've never used a Mac, but as all the docks out there which try to
copy i
-- Forwarded message --
From: Spike Burch
Date: Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Ayatana] Usability - Useless effect when clicking an icon (Unity)
To: Peterson Silva
minimize upon click is probably a bad idea. too easy for users to
accidentally lose their window
On Th
Just wanted to check. Are Windicators targeted for Natty? How much work has
been done? What if I wanted to play with it a little?
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.ne
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 12:04 +0530, Owais Lone wrote:
> Just wanted to check. Are Windicators targeted for Natty? How much
> work has been done? What if I wanted to play with it a little?
No there was no talk about anything unless canonical have it going on
it.
--fagan
___
15 matches
Mail list logo
