On 14/9/2010 00:33, frederik.nn...@gmail.com wrote:
Should we add an item high in the Session Menu called "Do Not Disturb"
with a checkbox before it??
You could combine this with the Away, Busy, Offline status. Those mostly
include situation where people don't want to be disturbed and would
su
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Walter Wittel wrote:
> And this further reinforces Diego's statement:
> "Apoorva Sharma proposed in this trhead a mockup that wouldn't need
> configuration as it only obscures system information, which IMHO is a
> better design because it avoids the basic flaw of
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 00:34, ubu...@kitterman.com wrote:
>
>
> "David Hamm" wrote:
>
> >"To be more accurate, the idea is that allowing user control is often a
> >way to sweep problems under the rug instead of actually solving them."
> >
> >Hear Hear
> >
> >*slams водка mug on table*
>
> Yes, b
"David Hamm" wrote:
>"To be more accurate, the idea is that allowing user control is often a
>way to sweep problems under the rug instead of actually solving them."
>
>Hear Hear
>
>*slams водка mug on table*
Yes, but extremism about this is equally dangerous. It results in a design that
is we
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 2:52 PM, David Hamm wrote:
> "To be more accurate, the idea is that allowing user control is often a
> way to sweep problems under the rug instead of actually solving them."
> Hear Hear
And this further reinforces Diego's statement:
"Apoorva Sharma proposed in this trhead
"To be more accurate, the idea is that allowing user control is often a
way to sweep problems under the rug instead of actually solving them."
Hear Hear
*slams водка mug on table*
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
Post to : ayatana@li
> There seems to be this idea that allowing user control is poor design.
To be more accurate, the idea is that allowing user control is often a
way to sweep problems under the rug instead of actually solving them.
Or, to put in another way, configurability is an option that makes
people stop t
Le mercredi 22 septembre 2010 à 11:01 -0400, Mark Russell a écrit :
> On 09/22/2010 06:16 AM, frederik.nn...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I think the design of our pretty bubbles is good, implementation not yet
> > complete and i have only one flaw to comment on:
> > Notify only!
> > ATM the bubbles don't
On 22 September 2010 12:16, frederik.nn...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 19:00, Diego Moya wrote:
>
>> The last option (current approach) makes it an all-or-nothing proposition
>> i.e. users that don't find the default design will not benefit at all from
>> notifications, being forced
On 09/22/2010 06:16 AM, frederik.nn...@gmail.com wrote:
> I think the design of our pretty bubbles is good, implementation not yet
> complete and i have only one flaw to comment on:
> Notify only!
> ATM the bubbles don't only notify, they also relay complete IM messages..
> that is an abuse by Empa
Hi List,
we all are familiar with variations of "Silent" modes on our mobile
telephones.
Voice messaging has been a normal thing on desktop computers and
notebooks/netbooks for years, since we have Yahoo Messenger with voice,
Google Talk with voice, Skype and many more to mention.
When busy, occu
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 19:00, Diego Moya wrote:
>
> On 20 September 2010 18:25, Luke Benstead wrote:
>
>>
>> I can only think of two options to display notifications while trying not
>> to obscure a user's workspace:
>>
>> a.) Don't display notifications in the working area (e.g. display them in
Yes yes yes!!!
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 09:45, dani wrote:
> some time ago in this mailing list, started to talk about a possible
> progress indicator
>
thanks for staying at it, this one really will eliminate at least 10 other
design problems we have been discussing, is what my common sense tel
some time ago in this mailing list, started to talk about a possible
progress indicator
now we have many types of disordered and different progress:
-Nautilus (it hasn't mono icon for indicator )
-Firefox (ends at the right corner of the screen)
"Brasero (it use another indicator)
just to name a
14 matches
Mail list logo
