On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 08/29/2014 12:04 AM, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
>
> >> So are you saying you are stuck with printf_float?
> >
> > It's not printf_float but _printf_float. I was told double underscore is
> only
> > necessary with old toolchain as they might a
On 08/29/2014 10:03 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 08/29/2014 09:51 AM, Grissiom wrote:
>>> Yes, it does. The namespace reserved for the implementation is _[_A-Z].
>>> The namespace _[a-z] is still available for the user. Which means the
>>> user can declare their own _printf_float, and WE (as the i
On 08/29/2014 12:04 AM, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
>> So are you saying you are stuck with printf_float?
>
> It's not printf_float but _printf_float. I was told double underscore is only
> necessary with old toolchain as they might add a leading underscore. So
> _printf_float should not pose any k
On 08/29/2014 09:51 AM, Grissiom wrote:
>> Yes, it does. The namespace reserved for the implementation is _[_A-Z].
>> The namespace _[a-z] is still available for the user. Which means the
>> user can declare their own _printf_float, and WE (as the implementation)
>> MUST NOT INTERFERE with it.
> From: Grissiom [mailto:chaos.pro...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 11:51 PM
>
> Yes, it does. The namespace reserved for the implementation is _[_A-Z].
> The namespace _[a-z] is still available for the user. Which means the
> user can declare their own _printf_float, and WE (as th
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf
> Of Thomas Preud'homme
> Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2014 12:27 PM
> Mmmh indeed. I checked C99 and section 7.1.3 paragraph 1 third clause
> states:
>
> "All identifiers that begin with an underscor
