On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 08/29/2014 12:04 AM, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: > > >> So are you saying you are stuck with printf_float? > > > > It's not printf_float but _printf_float. I was told double underscore is > only > > necessary with old toolchain as they might add a leading underscore. So > > _printf_float should not pose any kind of problem. > > Yes, it does. The namespace reserved for the implementation is _[_A-Z]. > The namespace _[a-z] is still available for the user. Which means the > user can declare their own _printf_float, and WE (as the implementation) > MUST NOT INTERFERE with it. Since WE are the implementation, we should > use the namespace reserved for us, namely __printf_float. > > You mean _[_a-z] (lower case) is the namespace reserved for implementation, right? -- Cheers, Grissiom _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
