On Friday 12 September 2008 21:53, Pink Boy wrote:
> As an aside, Freertos was just getting underway when I started
> using AVRX, but is now much more widely supported and mature now.
FreeRTOS is very good, and i ported it (for own use) to the ATtiny861.
It runs perfectly, but is to large for an
Stu Bell sez,
> > There's an OS for the AVR? Whoa. I had no idea.
>> Guess I know what website I'll be perusing this morning.
> >
> > Is it stable yet?
>
> Check the Tutorials forum on avrfreaks.net -- there's a
> thread with a pile of Oses for AVRs of all flavors.
I've used AVRX and it's certa
On Friday 12 September 2008 20:17, Stu Bell wrote:
> > Is it stable yet?
>
> Check the Tutorials forum on avrfreaks.net -- there's a thread with a
> pile of Oses for AVRs of all flavors.
Hmm, i had better called mine YAVTROS -
Compact form for: Yet Another AVR Real Time OS ;-)
But i didn't, beca
> > So have a look at my OS for the AVR, sources included (GPLv3)
> > http://www.femtoos.org/
> > ;-)
>
> There's an OS for the AVR? Whoa. I had no idea. Guess I know what
website I'll be perusing this morning.
>
> Is it stable yet?
Check the Tutorials forum on avrfreaks.net -- there's a thread
> -Original Message-
> From:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> org] On Behalf Of Gre7g Luterman
> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 9:19 AM
> To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] cbr and negative numbers
>
> - Orig
On Friday 12 September 2008 17:19, Gre7g Luterman wrote:
> > So have a look at my OS for the AVR, sources included (GPLv3)
> > http://www.femtoos.org/
> > ;-)
>
> There's an OS for the AVR?
It is for the AVR but at this moment there is only one port,
for the ATtiny861,461,261 The OS is complete
D]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Gre7g Luterman
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 8:19 AM
To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] cbr and negative numbers
- Original Message
From: Ruud Vlaming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
Sent: Friday, Sept
- Original Message
From: Ruud Vlaming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 8:23:23 AM
Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] cbr and negative numbers
> So have a look at my OS for the AVR, sources included (GPLv3)
> http://www.femtoos.org/
&g
On Thursday 11 September 2008 22:55, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> If you've got a patch that doesn't break anything else (in particular
> in non-mint8 land), I think it has a real chance of being
> incorporated. Otherwise, it will be tough.
Of course, that goes without saying. Maybe i have a look afte
Ruud Vlaming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, you are correct. And if i mange to dive into the problem and
> fix it myself (which i doubt i can) the patch would probably not be
> committed because of possible side effects.
GCC has a fairly well developed set of tests. If your patch doesn't
cau
Ruud Vlaming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem i am pointing out can (easily) be solved by letting gcc
> emit only positive/hexadecimal operands or by a minimal change in
> the way the cbr instruction calculates its operand: (0xFF-x) ->
> (0xFF - (x & 0xFF)).
If you've got a patch that doe
wired device.
-Original Message-
From: Ruud Vlaming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Weddington, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
Sent: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 4:42 am
Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] cbr and negative numbers
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 23:45, Weddington
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 23:45, Weddington, Eric wrote:
> But I highly doubt that the other developers are going to fix a problem
> that only shows up with -mint8.
Yeah, you are correct. And if i mange to dive into the problem and fix it
myself
(which i doubt i can) the patch would proba
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 16:01, you wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > However, if you activate the 8 bit integer option -mint8
> Full halt.
>
> -mint8 is not really supported. Yes, we know it causes all sorts of
> problems. It should never be used. I'd really like to see it ripp
> -Original Message-
> From:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> org] On Behalf Of Ruud Vlaming
> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 7:57 AM
> To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
> Subject: [avr-gcc-list] cbr and negative numbers
>
> Suppose you compile the (nonsense) code belo
15 matches
Mail list logo
