Ruud Vlaming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> The problem i am pointing out can (easily) be solved by letting gcc
> emit only positive/hexadecimal operands or by a minimal change in
> the way the cbr instruction calculates its operand: (0xFF-x) ->
> (0xFF - (x & 0xFF)).

If you've got a patch that doesn't break anything else (in particular
in non-mint8 land), I think it has a real chance of being
incorporated.  Otherwise, it will be tough.  I don't think there are
any free resources anywhere to maintain -mint8 beyond the state it is
currently in.  (And no, I don't want to see it ripped out, simply
because it has proven to be useful at least to /some/ people, and
there's no additional work involved in keeping it in.)

-- 
cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)


_______________________________________________
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list

Reply via email to