On 09/08/12 19:05, David Kelly wrote:
On Aug 9, 2012, at 11:18 AM, Erik Christiansen wrote:
You should be highly sceptical about using integrated SVN clients
in other programs. It is important that you don't mix major
version numbers of the svn clients on a machine - you'll end up
corrupting
On Aug 9, 2012, at 11:18 AM, Erik Christiansen wrote:
>> You should be highly sceptical about using integrated SVN clients in
>> other programs. It is important that you don't mix major version
>> numbers of the svn clients on a machine - you'll end up corrupting
>> your local svn metadata, or a
On 8/9/2012 11:46 AM, Erik Christiansen wrote:
On 09.08.12 10:54, Dave Harper wrote:
It seems like throughout my career nothing has been
more dynamic than the tools I've used. Virtually every time I start
a project the first thing that needs to be done is to re-evaluate the
current tools and pu
On 09.08.12 10:54, Dave Harper wrote:
> It seems like throughout my career nothing has been
> more dynamic than the tools I've used. Virtually every time I start
> a project the first thing that needs to be done is to re-evaluate the
> current tools and put together a new set that will get the job
> -Original Message-
> From: avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org [mailto:avr-
> gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of David
> Kelly
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 8:42 AM
> To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
> Subject:
On 09.08.12 17:22, David Brown wrote:
> And once you've got external makefiles, externally managed source
> files, and externally managed toolchains, then it's pretty easy to
> use whatever editor you want. You can then do a "build" at any time,
> without having to involve the editor. As a bonus,
On 8/9/2012 9:42 AM, David Kelly wrote:
I think its time to start a new thread leveraged off another:
Good idea - the other thread was getting cluttered with posts that had
nothing to do with the original topic.
Forget the editor, just get the debugger right.
I agree completely.
So asking of
On 09/08/2012 16:42, David Kelly wrote:
I think its time to start a new thread leveraged off another:
On Aug 9, 2012, at 9:05 AM, David Brown wrote:
For what it's worth, I too dislike the newer AVR Studio - partly
because I do most of my development work with Linux, and partly
because even on
I think its time to start a new thread leveraged off another:
On Aug 9, 2012, at 9:05 AM, David Brown wrote:
> For what it's worth, I too dislike the newer AVR Studio - partly because I do
> most of my development work with Linux, and partly because even on Windows it
> is a bloated mess. I ca
