[automake] Dependency question with _LDADD

to have a Makefile.am that will not generated relinking of my program once it has been linked one time. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Michel Briand -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software

Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD

Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:43:07 +0200 >Hello Michel, > >* Michel Briand wrote on Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 05:03:29PM CEST: >> >> Referring to GNU Automake manual §8.1.2, I'm using the _LDADD >> variable in my Makfile.am to lin

Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD

Great answer Ralf, thank you very much. My updates / discussion below :). Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:43:13 +0200 >Hello Michel, > >can we limit followups to the automake list only, please? > >* Michel Briand wrote on Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 05:09

Re: Dependency question with _LDADD

Olly Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:39:36 + (UTC) >On 2008-08-27, Michel Briand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Last, but not the least: autotools documentation that can be found on >> the web seems to obsoletes rapidly. There is the famous autobo

Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD

Peter Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:50:48 -0400 >Michel Briand wrote: >> >>>> :: >>>> src/lib/Makefile.am >>>> :: >>>> # Library: libtraining >>>> # Generates i

Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD

Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:13:11 +0200 >Hi Braden, > >* Braden McDaniel wrote on Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 08:48:45AM CEST: >> On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 07:41 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >> > * Michel Briand wrote on Wed, Aug 27, 2008 a

Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD

Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:19:32 +0200 ... >* Michel Briand wrote on Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:34:20AM CEST: >> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Mon, 29 Sep 2008 08:34:09 +0200 >> >* Michel Briand wrote on Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at

Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD

Hi all, I implemented a new idea for program's version. In src/bin/Makefile.am: internal_version.c: ${top_srcdir}/PROGRAM_VERSION ${top_srcdir}/vtempl.pl $(component) $(VERSION) < $(templ) > $@ training_SOURCES = training.c internal_version.c The vtempl.pl Perl program takes a template

Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD

Peter Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Tue, 07 Oct 2008 11:21:26 -0400 >Hello Michel, > >Michel Briand wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I implemented a new idea for program's version. >> >> In src/bin/Makefile.am: >> >> internal_version.c:

Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD

Peter Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:41:42 -0400 >Hi Michel, > >Michel Briand wrote: >> Peter Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Tue, 07 Oct 2008 11:21:26 -0400 >> >> >>> Hello Michel, >>> >>> Michel Briand w

Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD

Peter Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Wed, 08 Oct 2008 14:39:26 -0400 >Michel Briand wrote: >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> I implemented a new idea for program's version. >>>>>> >>>>>> In s

Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD

I'll enforce top-posting from this side of Atlantic ;) Don't worry. Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Wed, 8 Oct 2008 14:56:39 -0500 (CDT) >It seems that some folks on this list just can't help but retain all >previous content from the discussion thread and put their few lines at >the bott

automake training tutorial: distcheck, separate build directory and generated files

Hi all, (I've put the tutorial on a small website. So that I can release easily. http://kheb.homelinux.org/publish/autotraining/ : you'll find two files, one for a minimal release, another for a normal release). I've looked at 'make dist' to release the package. So after some readings I tried 'ma

Checking for a library ... different ways ...

Hello, a very naive review of many configure.[in,ac] to find out how do others do makes me ask this question : Why the library developer does not provide a consistent way to check for its library with automake/autoconf ? The bad thing is that the library user will have to do the job of 1/ search

Re: Where to generate .lo files ?

Ralf Wildenhues - Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:06:52 +0100 >Hello Michel, > >* Michel Briand wrote on Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 06:09:11PM CET: >> >> I wonder if it's possible to tell libtool to generate .lo file >> elsewhere than in source directory (where Makefile res

make dist and data package

Hello all, I'm working on a project that release code/library but also a large amount of data. I wonder if it's possible to create 2 packages with make dist. One for the software, one for the data directory ? Cheers, Michel -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your