Ralf Wildenhues <ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de> - Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:06:52 +0100
>Hello Michel, > >* Michel Briand wrote on Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 06:09:11PM CET: >> >> I wonder if it's possible to tell libtool to generate .lo file >> elsewhere than in source directory (where Makefile resides). > >Yes: > libtool --mode=compile $CC -o some/where/foo.lo -c else/where/foo.c > >If you're using Automake, then you're probably looking for the Automake >option subdir-objects, which causes objects to put in directories along >the subdir of the source files provided. > Hello, yes, I'm using automake. I put the sub-objects into my AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE. It works like you explained. Thanks. But why does it's not the default behavior ? I wanted to have my source directory cleaner: all .o files, plus .lo files, plus .Plo.... This makes directories unreadable.... Furthermore I noted that .o files are twice for one source file: $ find . -name "main.*" -ls 4964623 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 michel users 266 fév 4 10:22 ./main.lo 4440187 8 -rw-r--r-- 1 michel users 5268 fév 4 10:22 ./.libs/main.o 4394955 8 -rw-r--r-- 1 michel users 4544 fév 4 10:22 ./.deps/main.Plo 4964367 8 -rw-r--r-- 1 michel users 5000 fév 4 10:22 ./main.o 10371366 4 -r--r--r-- 1 michel users 804 déc 2 18:41 ./main.c I do not really understand here. Two main.o ! Cheers, Michel
