I am working on the development of a set of libraries. The core of the
code is LGPL, but it includes several optional modules that require
proprietary libraries. The problem with the modules using proprietary
libraries is that the company that owns those libraries requies a
license agreement stat
Automake includes the contents of the $LIBS variable in all link commands,
including linking libraries. This results in the following behavior:
1) If libtool is creating a static library, this seems to work fine. The
libraries in $LIBS are listed as dependencies in the resulting .la file.
2) If
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> * Jason Kraftcheck wrote on Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:42:34AM CET:
>
>>Automake includes the contents of the $LIBS variable in all link commands,
>>including linking libraries. This results in the following behavior:
>
>
Hi,
I'm working on moving an existing project to use autotools. One of the
issues that I've encountered is that the build process is very verbose.
Due to factors outside my control, the CPPFLAGS used for compiling contain
a very long list of include flags. This results in the compile command
bei
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Christopher Sean Morrison wrote on Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 07:55:27PM CET:
>> Counterproductive presumptuous flamings aside, there are compelling
>> arguments on both sides of the issue for having or quelling verbose
>> compilation output.
>
> Yes, the flaming all helps
Is there a way to enable dependency tracking by default even if only slow
mechanisms are available (as if --enable-dependency-tracking were always
specified?).
thanks,
- jason
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hello Jason,
>
> * Jason Kraftcheck wrote on Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 07:39:30PM CET:
>> Is there a way to enable dependency tracking by default even if only slow
>> mechanisms are available (as if --enable-dependency-tracking were always
>> specif
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Jason Kraftcheck wrote on Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 07:10:19PM CET:
>> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>>> <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2006-08/msg00024.html>
>> I don't understand why this is such a controversial issue.
>
I have some headers that are generated from other files. I don't what
these headers installed nor included in the dist. I do need them for the
compilation of some object files, though. If I attempt to add explicit
dependencies such as:
MeshTSTT.lo: $(TSTT_HDRS)
then automake will not generate
It would be nice if it were possible to run tests in parallel using
automake. Waiting for tests to complete on a 4-way box while they are run
on a single CPU is annoying. As most 'make' implementations already
support running in parallel (-j), automake could just utilize this
functionality to run
deckrider wrote:
> mkdir .libs
> mkdir .libs
> mkdir: cannot create .libs: File exists
> gcc -g -O2 -o goodbye src/goodbye.o
> gcc -g -O2 -o one src/one.o
> gcc: src/one.o: No such file or directory
> gcc: no input files
> one: *** Error exit code 1
> [/home/deverly/tmp/bug-1.0.0/build/bug-1.
not
essential to the build process. Unfortunately, automake fails when it
encounters unrecognized options. Is there some trick I could use to
conditionally add the options if they are supported?
thanks,
- jason kraftcheck
How does one go about using the AC_CONFIG_HEADERS functionality without
autoreconf and automake invoking autoheader? I've been letting autoheader
generate an unused 'config.h'. For example:
AC_CONFIG_HEADERS([config.h iBase_FCDefs.h])
Is there a less klugey way to do this?
thanks,
- jason
13 matches
Mail list logo