automake & missing subdirs

2006-01-09 Thread Jason Kraftcheck
I am working on the development of a set of libraries. The core of the code is LGPL, but it includes several optional modules that require proprietary libraries. The problem with the modules using proprietary libraries is that the company that owns those libraries requies a license agreement stat

building a shared library that depends on a static library

2006-03-04 Thread Jason Kraftcheck
Automake includes the contents of the $LIBS variable in all link commands, including linking libraries. This results in the following behavior: 1) If libtool is creating a static library, this seems to work fine. The libraries in $LIBS are listed as dependencies in the resulting .la file. 2) If

Re: building a shared library that depends on a static library

2006-03-04 Thread Jason Kraftcheck
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Jason, > > * Jason Kraftcheck wrote on Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:42:34AM CET: > >>Automake includes the contents of the $LIBS variable in all link commands, >>including linking libraries. This results in the following behavior: > >

verbosity

2007-01-12 Thread Jason Kraftcheck
Hi, I'm working on moving an existing project to use autotools. One of the issues that I've encountered is that the build process is very verbose. Due to factors outside my control, the CPPFLAGS used for compiling contain a very long list of include flags. This results in the compile command bei

Re: verbosity

2007-01-18 Thread Jason Kraftcheck
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Christopher Sean Morrison wrote on Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 07:55:27PM CET: >> Counterproductive presumptuous flamings aside, there are compelling >> arguments on both sides of the issue for having or quelling verbose >> compilation output. > > Yes, the flaming all helps

enable dependency tracking whenever available

2007-01-18 Thread Jason Kraftcheck
Is there a way to enable dependency tracking by default even if only slow mechanisms are available (as if --enable-dependency-tracking were always specified?). thanks, - jason

Re: enable dependency tracking whenever available

2007-01-18 Thread Jason Kraftcheck
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hello Jason, > > * Jason Kraftcheck wrote on Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 07:39:30PM CET: >> Is there a way to enable dependency tracking by default even if only slow >> mechanisms are available (as if --enable-dependency-tracking were always >> specif

Re: verbosity

2007-01-18 Thread Jason Kraftcheck
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Jason Kraftcheck wrote on Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 07:10:19PM CET: >> Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >>> <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2006-08/msg00024.html> >> I don't understand why this is such a controversial issue. >

generated headers

2007-02-01 Thread Jason Kraftcheck
I have some headers that are generated from other files. I don't what these headers installed nor included in the dist. I do need them for the compilation of some object files, though. If I attempt to add explicit dependencies such as: MeshTSTT.lo: $(TSTT_HDRS) then automake will not generate

running tests in parallel

2007-02-07 Thread Jason Kraftcheck
It would be nice if it were possible to run tests in parallel using automake. Waiting for tests to complete on a 4-way box while they are run on a single CPU is annoying. As most 'make' implementations already support running in parallel (-j), automake could just utilize this functionality to run

Re: HPUX: PARALLEL=4 make -P

2007-02-12 Thread Jason Kraftcheck
deckrider wrote: > mkdir .libs > mkdir .libs > mkdir: cannot create .libs: File exists > gcc -g -O2 -o goodbye src/goodbye.o > gcc -g -O2 -o one src/one.o > gcc: src/one.o: No such file or directory > gcc: no input files > one: *** Error exit code 1 > [/home/deverly/tmp/bug-1.0.0/build/bug-1.

options and automake version

2010-08-12 Thread Jason Kraftcheck
not essential to the build process. Unfortunately, automake fails when it encounters unrecognized options. Is there some trick I could use to conditionally add the options if they are supported? thanks, - jason kraftcheck

autoreconf/automake w/out autoheader

2011-01-12 Thread Jason Kraftcheck
How does one go about using the AC_CONFIG_HEADERS functionality without autoreconf and automake invoking autoheader? I've been letting autoheader generate an unused 'config.h'. For example: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS([config.h iBase_FCDefs.h]) Is there a less klugey way to do this? thanks, - jason