Re: AM_CFLAGS in the project root?

2004-06-18 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
e AM_CFLAGS a global default value, and override this definition locally in a Makefile.am if needed. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: location of .h's in library

2004-06-19 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "David" == David T Farning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: David> 5. these header will be installed in prefix/includes via David> _include_DATA = include_HEADERS = ... http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Headers -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: automake doesn't recognize AC_PROG_LIBTOOL

2004-06-19 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Oliver" == Oliver B Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Oliver> Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: >> Either you haven't installed libtool, or you forgot to run aclocal >> prior to autoconf and automake. Oliver> Neither nor. Might it be

Re: AutoGen-5.6.2 w/o libxml2 build problem

2004-06-21 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
efine DIST_SUBDIRS correctly itself. (Correctly means DIST_SUBDIRS will include all directories that can possibly appear in SUBDIRS.) See node `Top level' in the manual for a discussion about conditional subdirectories. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: Saving configuration files using automake

2004-07-02 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 04:32:28PM -0700, Kevin Nowaczyk wrote: > When the admin types `make install` I would like a > file "project/doc/foo.conf" to be placed in > "/etc/foo.conf". > > The configure script generated by autogen.sh contains > the line: > sysconfdir='${prefix}/etc' > > My question is

Re: automake bug

2004-07-04 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
nd let automake do its job: the two files it lists are files that automake would automatically distribute anyway. * To distribute extra files, do use the documented variable EXTRA_DIST. * Running `automake -Wall' will warn you about user definitition that overwrite automake variable (among other things). [...] -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: MinGW

2004-07-11 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
libraries. Libtool might be able to produce DLLs under MinGW, I don't know. So If there is a way, it will be using _LTLIBRARIES and libtool. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: Saving configuration files using automake

2004-07-11 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Kevin" == Kevin Nowaczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Kevin> For some reason that doesn't work. [...] Kevin> I'm using automake version 1.4-p4 Why do you keep using this 3-year-old junk? Come on and exchange your old bugs for fresh ones! -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: preventing autoheader from overwriting my files...

2004-07-15 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
ets Dale> overwritten. autoheader creates the .in only for the first AC_CONFIG_HEADERS argument. If you don't want your handcrafted template to be overwritten by autoheader, register a dummy header first using AC_CONFIG_HEADERS([config.h src/warped/WarpedConfig.h]) or AC_CONFIG_HEADERS([config.h]) AC_CONFIG_HEADERS([src/warped/WarpedConfig.h]) -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: distcheck bug

2004-07-15 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Bob" == Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bob> There is an Automake bug in 'make distcheck' which is causing me Bob> considerable pain. See DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS is the manual. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Automake 1.8d uploaded (release candidate for Automake 1.9)

2004-07-17 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Hi people, This is a release candidate for Automake 1.9. If you have some time, please help us tracking down bugs by trying this beta with your packages and reporting any issue you encounter. Especially, please shout loud if your package works with 1.8.5 but does not with 1.8d. I plan to release

Re: Weird behavior with multiple conditionals in single Makefile.am

2004-07-25 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
27;^ *([^ \t=:+]*)\s*([:+]?)=\s*(.*)' . "\$"; [...] > Would it be possible to add a warning to automake about such [1] > tabs-vs-spaces oddities? With the current sniffer, this sounds hard. But feel free to give it a try... -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

GNU Automake 1.9 released

2004-07-28 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
We're pleased to announce the release of Automake 1.9. This release contains many bug fixes and improvements, but not as much as in previous major releases. The NEWS entry is appended. Thanks to all people who have been testing pre-release, reporting bugs, contributing code, suggesting enhanceme

Re: Setting LC_ALL (i18n issues)

2004-07-29 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
with no avail. Its `set env(LC_ALL) C'. Check projects that do it for inspiration. http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-07/msg00031.html [...] -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: ltmain.sh

2004-07-29 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
inutes on my high end Mac, and up Gary> to an hour for some of our other developers :-( Does it? Running ./bootstrap takes 8 minutes on my poor PC. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: aclocal 1.8 produces useless aclocal.m4

2004-08-01 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
from... Sam> configure.ac:322: the top level Sam> configure.ac:322: warning: AC_RUN_IFELSE was called before AC_AIX Sam> configure.ac:344: warning: AC_COMPILE_IFELSE was called before AC_AIX Sam> configure.ac:344: the top level Sam> configure.ac:344: warning: AC_RUN_IFELSE was called before AC_AIX Sam> ... Look easy to fix in your configure.ac. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: PR376 Dependent libraries installed without order

2004-08-05 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
7;t think so, but that would be welcome... http://sources.redhat.com/automake/contribute.html -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: Using automake to install config.sub and config.guess

2004-08-05 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
automake release. We are using William> automake but not libtool so can't use libtoolize which is able to William> install them. Also William> automake --add-missing --copy --force-missing There is a fix for this bug in CVS. Automake 1.9.1 will update these files on such incantation. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: Using automake to install config.sub and config.guess

2004-08-05 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "William" == William S Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: William> Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: >>>>> "William" == William S Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: William> We are using AC_CANONICAL_HOST which requires config.sub &

Re: Using automake to install config.sub and config.guess

2004-08-06 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
. Existing file are only overwritten when you supply `--force-missing'. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: Using automake to install config.sub and config.guess

2004-08-06 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
uess William> installed? Automake only reads *.am files. Either you should use a top-level Makefile.am, or you should update these files yourself (it's not unusual to wget them from their CVS repository before release -- see Automake if you need an example). -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: translating automake infopage

2004-08-06 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
ns. E.g., does `info' supports several translated versions of a manual? If yes, where should they be installed and how should they be named? (I see nothing about this in the Texinfo manual, but maybe there are plans for this.) -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: Distributing BUILT_SOURCES dependencies and not target

2004-08-07 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
l, compile, etc... but make distcheck complains that Xavier> it cannot find foo.i!! But it *is* in the tarball?!? I don't get at Xavier> all what's happening here. It cannot find foo.i in the build directory because it is in the source directory. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: Distributing BUILT_SOURCES dependencies and not target

2004-08-07 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
nd that a file is to be distributed, and remove it in its back), especially when you have ways to express the truth (using dist_/nodist_). -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

GNU Automake 1.9.1 released

2004-08-11 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
We're pleased to announce the release of Automake 1.9.1. This is a tiny bug-fix release motivated by (1) the Debian GNU/Linux freeze, and (2) a three-week vacation starting in a couple of days :) The list of bug fixes is appended; we have not yet heard about regressions introduced by 1.9. You can

Re: specifying include directory

2004-08-11 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
actice for this? foodir = $(includedir)/foo foo_HEADERS = mumble.h -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: the correct rm macro in automake

2004-08-11 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Xavier" == Xavier Décoret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] Xavier> What is the correct variable to ask for removal of a file. Is this Xavier> $(rm) or something like this? rm is a constant. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: Installing libraries

2004-09-07 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 10:18:32AM +0200, Thomas Degris wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to know how do I install (by default) all the libraries in > $prefix/lib/my_package instead of $prefix/lib. Use pkglib_LIBRARIES or pkglib_LTLIBRARIES in your Makefile.am.

Re: Automake includes bug

2004-09-07 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Andreas" == Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] Andreas> 2004-08-30 Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Andreas> * automake.in ($PATH_PATTERN): Add `+'. Committed. Thanks. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: some usage questions

2004-09-07 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
lding client xxx, the client will be relinked whenever libwhatever.a has changed. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: Autoconf 2.59 doesn't work with automake-1.9

2004-09-07 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
.13. If you are running the above example and the failing configure from the very same shell session, it might be caused by a shell configuration that mistakenly reset PATH for non-login shells. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: non-portable makefiles?

2004-09-07 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Bob" == Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] Bob> Apparently when automake is executed to generate Makefile.in, some Bob> saved information is OS-dependent. That is bad. I'd love a diff between those two different Makefile.in, then. [...] -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: remove certain makefile rules during make dist

2004-09-07 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
ONAL to enable/disable these rules. That sounds cleaner than any hook hackery. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: compile problem

2004-09-07 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
on, Inc. +# Copyright (C) 2003, 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. # # This file is part of GNU Automake. # @@ -33,8 +33,9 @@ END cat > Makefile.am << 'END' +AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS = subdir-objects lib_LTLIBRARIES = libmod1.la mod2.la -libmod1_la_SOURCES = mod1.c +libmod1_la_SOURCES = sub/mod1.c libmod1_la_LDFLAGS = -module libmod1_la_LIBADD = -dlopen mod2.la mod2_la_SOURCES = mod2.c @@ -50,9 +51,9 @@ END -mkdir liba +mkdir sub liba -cat > mod1.c << 'END' +cat > sub/mod1.c << 'END' int mod1 () { -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: non-portable makefiles?

2004-09-07 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Bob" == Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] Bob> there is still a difference in the generated Makefile.in Bob> files. Good catch, thanks! I'm installing the following on HEAD and branch-1-9. 2004-09-07 Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[E

Re: config.status & distcheck

2004-09-07 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
make distcheck', make distcheck fails due to Bob> the distribution files being left behind in the test directory. That does not ring a bell. Could you provide instructions to reproduce this on an existing package or on a test case? -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: executing shell commands (like cp)

2004-09-07 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
ght consider using James Henstridge's ltihooks.py to import libtool libraries directly from Python. You can find ltihooks.py in pygtk. I'm using it in Spot (spot.lip6.fr) to load Swig generated libtool modules. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: compile problem

2004-09-07 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
o files. [...] Gary> Meant to ask, why doesn't AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE (conditionally if Gary> necessary) simply invoke AM_PROG_CC_C_O? We know it's needed only after processing the Makefile.am files. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: Bitten by Makefile.am syntax error

2004-09-07 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
e the line continuation | request. This happens in *some* Make implementations. However this is contrary to POSIX. See `Escaped newline in comments' paragraph in the `Limitations of Make' section of the Autoconf manual. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: AM_PROG_CC_C_O?

2004-09-10 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 09:33:30AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > My non-recursive Automake project (based on latest Automake CVS) > places objects in subdirectories. The project uses libtool to build > all objects. However, Automake complains: > > % automake > Makefile.am: C objects in subdir b

Re: AM_PROG_CC_C_O?

2004-09-10 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
name of one file that is built with -c -o without libtool. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: Ada95 support for Automake?

2004-09-12 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
achieved by custom rules, of course; but (1) that can constitute a good source of inspiration and (2) converting AdaSockets to whatever way it chosen to support Ada in Automake would be a good test. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz ? autom4te.cache ? buffer-warnings.patch ? exeext.patch ? x ? m4/ada.m4 ? tes

GNU Automake 1.9.2 released (10th anniversary release)

2004-09-19 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
We're pleased to announce the release of Automake 1.9.2. This is a small bug-fix release (the list of bugs fixed is appended), and this is also an anniversary release. Automake was started on 1994-09-19 so it has 10 years today. To celebrate this the manual has been augmented with a "History"

Re: compile problem

2004-09-20 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
but I haven't flushed all my mails yet. I agree it would be better to set down a common lock scheme, although that really should not hold any release. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: compile problem

2004-09-20 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
AC_PROG_RANLIB, etc. I once thought that since Automake knew what extra macros where required, it could generate a configure.ac fragment with these. But that sounds too fragile and tricky. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: dependency tracking for .S assembler files

2004-09-24 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
nk holding this patch is that it adds a new language without documenting it. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: dependency tracking for .S assembler files

2004-09-24 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
me? In other words, the `compile' script needed for C compilers, and since we use C compilers to compiler asm, do we need the `compile' script too? -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: Trouble with MSVC `cl -c -o ...'

2004-10-11 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Hi, On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 02:20:30PM +0100, Milan Tichy wrote: > > I used both AC_PROG_CC_C_O and AM_PROG_CC_C_O but it didn't help. Could you state your Automake version and post a copy of your configure.ac?

Re: Trouble with MSVC `cl -c -o ...'

2004-10-11 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
e}bj"; then + mv "${cofile}bj" "$ofile" fi rmdir "$lockdir" -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: Possable automake 1.9 bug

2004-10-13 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
are not programs. If that used to work in 1.8 it was a bug. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: installing a dir

2004-10-01 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
' section of the manuals.) -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: Error: am__fastdepCC does not appear in AM_CONDITIONAL

2004-10-01 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
their full output. http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: Possable automake 1.9 bug

2004-10-22 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
e manual, the section `Building a Shared Library' was revamped last year. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: Shipping generated file from generated generator

2004-10-22 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
, and I recommend against it. A distributed file should never depend upon a non-distributed built file (see also node distcleancheck in the FAQ). -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: preventing re-running of texi2dvi?

2004-10-22 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
but this is just not supported presently. (Unless you overwrite a significant portion of the variables and rules generated by Automake, or arrange to rename these files before distribution.) -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: automake 1.8.5 problem

2004-10-22 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
invalid variable `dist_bin_SCRIPTS' saiph> Makefile.am:1: invalid variable `dist_bin_SCRIPTS' saiph> make: *** [Makefile.in] Error 1 saiph> after i have googling for it i found it was a fixed old bug.. Indeed it is: this is Automake 1.4 speaking. In other words you are not running the version you think you are. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: Forcing the linking language

2004-10-22 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
dummy.f so that the file does not have to exist. That's the way I do too. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: creating a shared library from more than one src directory

2004-10-22 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Jens" == Jens Rehsack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] Jens> Are there any tips how to write such Makefile.am's? Consider using Libtool convenience libraries for your subdirectories (there is a section about this in the Automake manual). -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: Error because README is missing

2004-10-23 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
you could modify it to show how to reproduce your problem? -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: LIBOBJS problem with automake 1.8

2004-10-25 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
pt.o Peter> ./getopt1.o Peter> ..., not in the libgetopt directory. Thus, compilation fails Peter> because the linker won't find the files. Peter> Is there any simple way to fix this? Sure: AC_LIBOBJ([getopt]) AC_LIBOBJ([getopt1]) -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: LIBOBJS problem with automake 1.8

2004-10-26 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 02:01:18PM +0200, Peter Simons wrote: > Alexandre Duret-Lutz writes: > > >> AC_LIBOBJ(libgetopt/getopt) > >> AC_LIBOBJ(libgetopt/getopt1) > > > AC_LIBOBJ([getopt]) > > AC_LIBOBJ([getopt1]) > > Then automake / autoconf

Re: LIBOBJS problem with automake 1.8

2004-10-26 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 02:43:26PM +0200, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 02:01:18PM +0200, Peter Simons wrote: > > Alexandre Duret-Lutz writes: > > > > >> AC_LIBOBJ(libgetopt/getopt) > > >> AC_LIBOBJ(libgetopt/getopt1) > >

Re: LIBOBJS problem with automake 1.8

2004-10-26 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 04:35:26PM +0200, Peter Simons wrote: > Alexandre Duret-Lutz writes: > > > It occured to me that maybe you were trying to use > > $(LIBOBJS) outside of libgetopt/Makefile.am. Don't. > > $(LIBOBJS) is expected to be used only in the director

GNU Automake 1.9.3 released

2004-11-01 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
We're pleased to announce the release of Automake 1.9.3. This is a bug-fix release, the list of bugs fixed is appended. You can find the new release here: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/automake/automake-1.9.3.tar.gz ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/automake/automake-1.9.3.tar.gz.sig ftp://ftp.gnu.org/g

Re: Creating some directory at install time.

2004-11-09 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
n your Makefile.am. Note that if your install-{exec,data}-local target creates a directory and you care about the GNU Coding Standards, you should also create this directory in installdirs-local. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: License of m4/ltoptions.m4

2004-11-09 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
ng) are intermixed into aclocal.m4. (Seems another good reason to prefer setups with m4_include). (*) Amusingly, Automake's own aclocal.m4 is probably the only aclocal.m4 where there is no such confusion. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: License of m4/ltoptions.m4

2004-11-10 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
the file were m4_included (we don't do that for Automake macros anyway, but is that a reason to disallow it?) -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: License of m4/ltoptions.m4

2004-11-10 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
erms that you use for the rest of the package. "configuration script generated by Autoconf" is what the aux scripts already use. "or any derived output" is a lame attempt to allow tools such as aclocal (without singling out aclocal) to preprocess the file, as long as the intent is to build a configure script. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: License of m4/ltoptions.m4

2004-11-10 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Gary> Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: [...] >> I don't understand the intent of "as input to GNU Autoconf, GNU >> Automake, or GNU Libtool". AFAICT Libtool does not input m4 >>

Re: License of m4/ltoptions.m4

2004-11-10 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
; script (and perhaps some associated intermediate files), Paul> then you may distribute this file and the derived files Paul> for that purpose, under the same terms that you use for Paul> the rest of the package. [...] President Eggert, you have my vote! -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: aclocal.test failure

2004-11-13 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
on't know: the test suite displays $PATH right before the start of your quote. It should use /usr/src/local/automake/tests/aclocal-1.9a, which itself redirects to /usr/src/local/automake/aclocal. Please do direct bug reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED], a spurious failure of CVS Automake is noise fo

Re: AM_WITH_REGEX macro

2004-11-13 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
create one? No. Simply append regex.m4 to your package's aclocal.m4. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: Case insensitive file system, ChangeLog and CHANGELOG

2004-11-13 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
orth fixing Peter> and c) there is probably a "better way". [...] d) the patch is more than 15 lines and you haven't signed copyright papers for Automake. Would you do that? -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz Please email the following information to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and we will send you t

Re: bug-automake address

2004-11-14 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Bob" == Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bob> There is no mention of bug-automake on the web page. Bob> http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/ Thanks. I added a link to the Automake home page, which has up-to-date info in this regard. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: What might cause this infinite recursion?

2004-11-21 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Bruce" == Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] >> gmake[5]: Warning: File `autogen' has modification time 1.8 s in the future [...] I suggest you complain to your system administrator. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: Convincing Automake to support libtool

2004-11-21 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
IG_MACRO_DIR to way you thought. It certainly isn't the Automake manual. See also http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-11/msg00097.html -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: dependencies to libraries

2004-11-22 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
libdi.a instead shouldn't be a big deal. noinst_LIBRARIES = libdi.a libdi_a_SOURCES = di_dudata.c di_di.c di_dumd.c ... [...] Roesner> I have not found any hint in the web, `info automake' is your friend. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: Toplevel configure.ac / Makefile.am for optional directories

2004-11-25 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
R, `aux_config'. J> Makefile.am:34: required directory ./TAO does not exist J> autoreconf: failed to run automake: No such file or directory J> Any suggestions? I'm augmenting the aforementioned section with the following bits. 2004-11-24 Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Installing (everything in) a generated directory

2004-11-25 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
he manual is not recreated (which is undoubtedly what you want, otherwise you wouldn't distribute it). Hence either the install rule is wrong in assuming that the manual is always in the build directory, or the build rule is wrong in building the manual in the build directory. I suggest you always build distributed files in the source directory. (BTW this is mandatory if you want to support VPATH builds with some non-GNU implementation of make.) -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: execvp: /bin/bash: Argument list too long

2004-11-25 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
clude_HEADERS into two variables or more, so that two install rules get generated. pkginclude1dir = $(pkgincludedir) pkginclude2dir = $(pkgincludedir) nobase_pkginclude1_HEADERS = ... nobase_pkginclude2_HEADERS = ... Maybe there is a better way? -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: Installing (everything in) a generated directory

2004-11-25 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
en a user attempt a VPATH build. There is no point in distributing the doc if users have to rebuild it anyway.) -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

RFC for new FAQ entry: Flag Variables Ordering

2004-11-29 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
27;. Using variables like this gives you full control on the ordering of the flags. For instance if there is a flag in $(WARNINGCFLAGS) that you want to negate for a particular target, you can use something like `prog1_CFLAGS = $(AM_CFLAGS) -no-flag'. If all these flags had been forcefully appended to `CFLAGS' there would be no way to disable one flag. Yet another reason to leave user variables to users. Finally, we have avoided calling the variable `LIBFOO_LDFLAGS' (with an underscore), because that would cause Automake thinking that this is actually a per-target variable (like `mumble_LDFLAGS') for some non-declared `LIBFOO' target. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: RFC for new FAQ entry: Flag Variables Ordering

2004-12-01 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
onardo> *FLAGS variables. Is that correct? Yes. Oh well, almost. You cannot really lump LDADD and LIBADD together: there is no LIBADD variable, only per-target _LIBADD variables. To some extent, LIBADD is less confusing than LDADD. Leonardo> It may sound obvious, but I find it confusing =) I confess I once wrote AM_LDADD in a Makefile.am. (To make matters worse, that was while teaching someone else how to write a Makefile.am for his package!) -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: svn copy conflicts with autotools ?

2004-12-01 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Files under CVS'' in Stepan> the gettext manual. Speaking of manuals, the FAQ section of the Automake manual also have a node called "CVS" and listing pros, cons, and workarounds. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: troubles with conditional install using automake

2004-12-01 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Unlikely: Automake 1.8 requires Autoconf 2.58 or greater. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: Relative path in CPPFLAGS and distcheck

2004-12-04 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
er than explicitly listing this Robert> subdirectory, adding a Makefile.am there, ... since there's Robert> nothing to build there? Yes. However you'd better use noinst_HEADERS instead of EXTRA_DIST so that `make tags' and friends process the headers. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: CXXLINK in generated Makefiles

2004-12-04 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
ts of an automake-generated Makefile.in.) I believe the simplest solution is to call libtool as you always did, and simply add the missing --tag=CXX option. [...] -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: extending automake support for exotic languages

2004-12-04 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
n't intend to accept a patch for Guillaume> every minor research language in the world. Indeed. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: Relative path in CPPFLAGS and distcheck

2004-12-05 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 03:26:30PM -0600, Robert Lowe wrote: > A make distcheck with this example fails How?

Re: adding specific C flags for a SINGLE source file

2004-12-09 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
/`.obj' extensions, and all the other flags variables involved in a compilation, you will end up modifying a copy of the rule previously output by `automake' for this file. If a new release of Automake generates a different rule, your copy will need to be updated by hand. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: adding specific C flags for a SINGLE source file

2004-12-10 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
AULTFLAGS) $(O3) as appropriate. ($(O3) being the Makefile variable that contains -O3 if the compiler support it). Does that sound sensible? -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: adding specific C flags for a SINGLE source file

2004-12-10 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
n was delivered to your mailbox 10 days ago. It will be in 1.9.4. From: Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RFC for new FAQ entry: Flag Variables Ordering To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 01:49:07 +0100 -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

GNU Automake 1.9.4 released

2004-12-18 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
We're pleased to announce the release of Automake 1.9.4. This is a bug-fix release, the list of bugs fixed is appended. You can find the new release here: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/automake/automake-1.9.4.tar.gz ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/automake/automake-1.9.4.tar.gz.sig ftp://ftp.gnu.org/g

Re: automake confusing c and c++

2004-12-20 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
pe> hello_cc_SOURCE = hello_cc.cc Philippe> endif s/_SOURCE/_SOURCES/ If no `target_SOURCES' variable is specified it defaults to `target.c'. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: missing is called when trying to compile

2004-12-20 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
upposed to work without the need JRBCAST> of autotools presence?. Yes it is, as long as the timestamps are preserved. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: AM_LDFLAGS vs. maude_la_LDFLAGS

2004-12-26 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
nd shouldn't the LDFLAGS be last? It is in CXXLINKS, but in the Akim> command line. Fixed in the patch below as a side-effect of using maude_LDFLAGS instead of AM_LDFLAGS. 2004-12-26 Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fix handling of per-target flags in link rul

Re: install directory

2004-12-26 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Thank for the suggestion. This is similar to PR/383 so I've added your email to the Cc: list for this PR. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: Automake and new tar

2004-12-30 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
ng filenames even before the tar-* option were introduced. Hence filename-length-max=99 was suggested as an option only for those who care. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: configure-generated *.in's

2004-12-31 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "J" == J T Conklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: J> I've since learned that the problem isn't in autoconf, but in J> automake. It was. More than one year ago. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: configure-generated *.in's

2005-01-01 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
t; long been fixed. My bad. I though you were talking about an AC_CONFIG_FILE input that is the output of an earlier AC_CONFIG_FILE. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >