On Tue, 8 Aug 2017, Warren Young wrote:
On Aug 7, 2017, at 11:39 PM, Dharmil Shah wrote:
I followed your suggestions and hence I am able to compile my package using
the llvm compiler.
I hope you chose option 3.
On re-reading that email, I think option 2 is wrong, or at least, it isn’t what
On Aug 9, 2017, at 9:00 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
wrote:
>
> Passing a relative path to CC seems error prone since it only applies to the
> current working directory and will fail as soon as any Makefile recurses.
Maybe you have a better answer to this related question: is there a portable
alternat
On 08/09/2017 12:02 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> On Aug 9, 2017, at 9:00 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
> wrote:
>>
>> Passing a relative path to CC seems error prone since it only applies to the
>> current working directory and will fail as soon as any Makefile recurses.
>
> Maybe you have a better answer t
On Aug 9, 2017, at 11:39 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>
> Why not just:
>
> ./configure CC="$PWD/../../llvm-arm-toolchain-ship/3.8/bin/clang"
>
> which turns your relative name into an absolute one?
>
> Do you HAVE to have the canonical name?
It just makes the log messages nicer to read.
