On Tue, 8 Aug 2017, Warren Young wrote:
On Aug 7, 2017, at 11:39 PM, Dharmil Shah <dysha...@gmail.com> wrote:
I followed your suggestions and hence I am able to compile my package using
the llvm compiler.
I hope you chose option 3.
On re-reading that email, I think option 2 is wrong, or at least, it isn’t what
I meant to write:
$ ./configure CC=../../llvm-arm-toolchain-ship/3.8/bin/clang
The main problem with option 2 is that it requires you to give that long
command on each manual re-configure. It’s better to code the clang-seeking
rules into an autoconf macro, if only because you will eventually move on to
Clang 3.9+.
Passing a relative path to CC seems error prone since it only applies
to the current working directory and will fail as soon as any Makefile
recurses.
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
