On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 08:31 -0500, Robert Boehne wrote:
> Statically linking libc is a recipe for disaster, so either read and
> understand why, or just take my word for it.
I'm in agreement and standard libraries are something I'm fine with not
statically linking against, although it's not unus
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 14:57 +0100, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> What you're thinking of is -Wl,-Bstatic and -Wl,-Bdynamic — for the GNU
> linker at least, but this is not portable.
>
> Seriously, it sounds to me like something else is wrong, you should never
> have the need to statically link stuff
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 07:37 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> You have
> > PKG_CHECK_MODULES([libzzip], [zziplib], [have_zzip=yes], [have_zzip=no])
> Have you seen
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19541
> ? Maybe try PKG_CHECK_MODULES_STATIC
> or PKG_CONFIG="pkg-config --static"
Hey Dan. I'
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Kip Warner wrote:
> $ pkg-config --libs zziplib
> -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-z,relro -lzzip -lz
>
> $ pkg-config --static --libs zziplib
> -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-z,relro -lzzip -lz
Aw, foo. I was under the misapprehention
On Sat, 2013-06-01 at 17:17 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Aw, foo. I was under the misapprehention that --static would cause
> pkgconfig to reference the .a files. I've clearly been spending
> too much time in cmake-land.
No worries ;)
> I don't suppose you've tried passing absolute paths to the .a
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 07:37 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> You have
> > PKG_CHECK_MODULES([libzzip], [zziplib], [have_zzip=yes], [have_zzip=no])
> Have you seen
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19541
> ? Maybe try PKG_CHECK_MODULES_STATIC
By the way, outside of that upstream bug report,
On Saturday 01 June 2013 19:27:46 Kip Warner wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 08:31 -0500, Robert Boehne wrote:
> > I don't quite understand why you think you need the rest linked
> > statically,
>
> Libraries like the following may not be present on the end user's system
> already:
be aware that w
On Sat, 2013-06-01 at 23:14 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> be aware that what ever version of glibc & gcc you use to build, the end user
> cannot have a version older than that or it'll fail to start
Do you mean in the case of dynamic linking? If so, that's awful. But
strange because I've seen m
