On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 14:57 +0100, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> What you're thinking of is -Wl,-Bstatic and -Wl,-Bdynamic — for the GNU
> linker at least, but this is not portable.
> 
> Seriously, it sounds to me like something else is wrong, you should never
> have the need to statically link stuff that way unless you're doing release
> management of binary applications, in which case you have another set of
> problems entirely.

Hey Diego. Sorry, I'm confused. Are you referring to my need to
statically link against certain libraries, or Robert's suggested
approach?

-- 
Kip Warner -- Software Engineer
OpenPGP encrypted/signed mail preferred
http://www.thevertigo.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to