Re: superfluous test in AC_CHECK_HEADERS?

2004-08-17 Thread Raja R Harinath
Hi, Frederik Fouvry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm using > > AC_CHECK_HEADERS([ecl.h]) > > in configure.ac, and that gives the following in the log file > (autoconf 2.57): > > configure:5067: checking ecl.h usability > configure:5080: gcc -c -g -O2 -I/proj/contrib/lkb/latest/include > -I/pr

Re: uninstall fails to remove library

2004-08-17 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Stephen, Stephen Torri wrote: > When make installs a library via make install it gets place in the > correct location as a .so file. Yet when make uninstall is run it fails > to remove the .so file. The reason for the failure is that its looking > for the .la file and not the .so. > libtool: 1

Re: superfluous test in AC_CHECK_HEADERS?

2004-08-17 Thread Frederik Fouvry
| > I'm using | > | > AC_CHECK_HEADERS([ecl.h]) | > | > in configure.ac, and that gives the following in the log file | > (autoconf 2.57): | > | > configure:5067: checking ecl.h usability | > configure:5080: gcc -c -g -O2 -I/proj/contrib/lkb/latest/include -I/proj/contrib/lib/ecl/h conftest.c >

Re: uninstall fails to remove library

2004-08-17 Thread Stephen Torri
On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 10:09, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > This sounds like a bug in your old libtool. Your Automake is out of > date as well. > > Bob The highest libtool that is available via the Gentoo portage system is 1.5.6. I will upgrade to that. How is 1.8.3 an out of date automake as well?

Re: uninstall fails to remove library

2004-08-17 Thread Stephen Torri
On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 10:55, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Stephen Torri wrote: > > > On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 10:09, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > >> This sounds like a bug in your old libtool. Your Automake is out of > >> date as well. > > > > The highest libtool that is available via t

Re: translating automake infopage

2004-08-17 Thread Cancerbero
El Sat, 07 Aug 2004 02:24:50 +0200 Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > [Moved from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>> "Cancerbero" == Cancerbero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Cancerbero> Hello. > > Hi Cancerbero, > > Cancerbero> I don't know if this is the correct way to make >