Ok, so, does it mean such a task isnt needed anymore?
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
It seems to me that the plan to implement Automake in Scheme is a
failed scheme which was suggested by [EMAIL PROTECTED] back in the days when
Guile & Scheme were described to be superior to Perl and Tcl.
Bob
On Thu, 5
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
"William" == William S Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
William> Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> "William" == William S Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
William> We are using AC_CANONICAL_HOST which requires config.sub
>> and
William> config.guess. We'd like
>>> "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> There is a fix for this bug in CVS. Automake 1.9.1 will update
>> these files on such incantation.
Ralf> Could you elaborate on which conditions exactly, automake-1.9.1 will
Ralf> update config.guess and config.sub and how th
>>> "William" == William S Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
William> The problem is with subdirectories and the root
William> directory containing a Makefile.in rather than a
William> Makefile.am.
Yeah, many things in Automake happens only when processing the
top-level Makefile. Inst
[Moved from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> "Cancerbero" == Cancerbero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Cancerbero> Hello.
Hi Cancerbero,
Cancerbero> I don't know if this is the correct way to make
Cancerbero> this kind of questions. If not, please let me know
Cancerbero> where... (and excuse me for my
Hi,
I have a special offer available for you at our casino.
$20 to try our internet casino, no deposit is necessary!
At the casino software's cashier enter bonus code: FR93P
$200 bonus on your first deposit!
At the casino software's cashier enter bonus code: FMJKU
Allow us to show you our quali
