Hi all,
I am using a yacc/bison source file in a libtool library, but I create
both an installable static/shared version of the library as well as an
internal convenience library (so I can later on link the PIC objects
directly into another shared library). Since I need the header file
with th
First, I must solicit your strictest confidence in this
transaction, this is by virtue of it's nature as being
utterly confidential and top secret .
We are top officials from the Federal Ministry of Works and Housing,(FMWH),
Federal Ministry of Finance and the Presidency,
making up the Contract Rev
Hi,
Thanks for your e-mail.
bernd> It should if you say "make -k check".
"make -k check" only partially works for me. The "-k" option causes
"make" to ignore all errors and therefore continue with recursive
execution -- in this way it does what I want.
But I only want "make" to ignore errors f
Ireneusz SZCZESNIAK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
But I only want "make" to ignore errors from running tests, not all
errors. My test scripts are automatically generated by "make" and
then run. If "make" fails to generate such a script, then I want
"make" to report the error and stop.
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 11:28:44AM -0600, Ireneusz SZCZESNIAK wrote:
> But I only want "make" to ignore errors from running tests, not all
> errors.
Try something like:
make && make -k check
The first one builds, and dies on any error. The second one,
which only runs if the first one suc
Hi,
Thanks for your long e-mail. I appreciate it!
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote:
> there is a documented Makefile.am var TESTS_ENVIRONMENT which you
> can use to not only set various env var variables, but specify a
> completely different interpreter aside from the bourne shell, t
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:07:17 -0600 (MDT)
From: Ireneusz SZCZESNIAK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Yeah! But still I want the output of "make check" to be clean. When
a test fails, then I expect to see: "FAIL: test.sh".
in this case the only thing i can suggest is to post-process the
Makefil
Hi,
Thanks for your e-mail!
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>> But I only want "make" to ignore errors from running tests, not all
>> errors. My test scripts are automatically generated by "make" and
>> then run. If "make" fails to generate such a script, then I want
>> "make" to
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: automake problem/bug
Newsgroups: gnu.utils.bug
Organization: Dept. Physics, Royal Holloway, University of London
Summary:
Keywords:
User-Agent: tin/1.4.3-2502 ("Marian") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.19 (i586))
Dear All,
I am attempting to build some KDE programs w
Hi,
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote:
>Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:07:17 -0600 (MDT)
>From: Ireneusz SZCZESNIAK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Yeah! But still I want the output of "make check" to be clean. When
>a test fails, then I expect to see: "FAIL: test.sh".
>
> in this c
Hi,
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>> I should have written: "My test scripts are automatically generated
>> by the Make software (not the "make" command) and then run".
>> Actually, the scripts are both generated and run by "make check".
>
> OK. But you can have them generated by
Marc,
> I want to import a Makefile.mk file which has variables generated by an
> autoconf/automake project which i depend on. This toolkit has most of
> the autoconf tests i need already run.
You have two options:
- Have the depended-on package supply a shell script that prints
configurat
Hi,
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:07:17 -0600 (MDT)
>From: Ireneusz SZCZESNIAK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Yeah! But still I want the output of "make check" to be clean. When
>a test fails, then I expect to see: "FAIL: test.sh".
>
> in this c
13 matches
Mail list logo
