On Jun 11, 2001, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Gary> Thanks. Applied on branch-1-4. If there is an automake-1.4-p5,
Gary> this will be in it!
> Applied on HEAD.
Is it really correct to assume that $PWD = $top_srcdir when r
On Jun 15, 2001, "Steve M. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I normally want the program-specific flags _in addition_ to the
> generic flags. So I *always* have $(LDADD) in $foo_LDADD.
But consider the case of not wanting $(LDADD) in foo_LDADD. Or
consider cases in which the order matters,
On Jun 14, 2001, Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was thinking I could create a new `patch' category in the automake
> Gnats and ask people to put such patches there as attachments. What
> do people think of this?
You can't reliably extract patches from Gnats.
Savannah.gnu.org has a n
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 05:02:02PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Is it really correct to assume that $PWD = $top_srcdir when running
> missing? The test in the patch assumes so, but I'm not sure this
> assumption holds for all uses of `missing'.
I made this assumption without checking it, beca
On Jun 17, 2001, Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I made this assumption without checking it, because the current
> (1.4-p4) missing makes the same assumption. It contains the line
> files=`sed -n 's/^[ ]*A[CM]_CONFIG_HEADER(\([^)]*\)).*/\1/p' configure.in`
> in the autoheader cas
