On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 05:02:02PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Is it really correct to assume that $PWD = $top_srcdir when running
> missing? The test in the patch assumes so, but I'm not sure this
> assumption holds for all uses of `missing'.
I made this assumption without checking it, because the current
(1.4-p4) missing makes the same assumption. It contains the line
files=`sed -n 's/^[ ]*A[CM]_CONFIG_HEADER(\([^)]*\)).*/\1/p' configure.in`
in the autoheader case.
Looking closer at the script, I notice that it also seems to assume
$PWD = $top_srcdir = $top_builddir.
Martin
