> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexandre> We compute dependencies in parallel with the actual
Alexandre> compilation, but we mustn't consider the job done before
Alexandre> both are complete.
Ah! Yes, I overlooked the ` "$@" '. Thanks!
> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexandre> On Oct 16, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This guy looks good to me. Any objection?
Alexandre> Nope.
Pavel, you still consider this patch alive?
| 2000-06-21 Alex Hornby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| * depcomp: Altered sed clause to strip of inclusion depth
| numbers generated by cpp. Also output in gcc style.
|
| Index: depcomp
| ===
| RCS file: /cvs/automake/au
On Oct 17, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | 2000-06-21 Alex Hornby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> |
> | * depcomp: Altered sed clause to strip of inclusion depth
> | numbers generated by cpp. Also output in gcc style.
> Fine with me. Any objection?
Nope.
--
Alexand
Hi,
I am getting the foll. error message when I am trying to build
automake 1.4 on 11.00 hpux machine:
make all
Making all in .
Making all in m4
No suffix list.
Making all in tests
No suffix list.
It says no suffix list in
I have a project being worked on by two people; both with gmake but
one not using gcc. Is there a way to allow the gcc developer to use
automake dependency tracking, while the other developer uses some
other system. The other developer has gcc (but doesn't use it for
the code), so is there
| I am getting the foll. error message when I am trying to build
| automake 1.4 on 11.00 hpux machine:
You said it all: HPUX. Their Make is incredibly broken and is often
responsible of build failures. I would *strongly* encourage you to
install GNU Make and use this one only.
Hi,
Thanks for replying.
But I am getting the error even if I use the gmake.
Making all in .
gmake[1]: Entering directory `/home/praveen/automake-1.4'
gmake[1]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/praveen/automake-
On 17 Oct 2000, Akim Demaille wrote:
>
> | I am getting the foll. error message when I am trying to build
> | automake 1.4 on 11.00 hpux machine:
>
> You said it all: HPUX. Their Make is incredibly broken and is often
> responsible of build failures. I would *strongly* encourage you to
> inst
> "Thomas" == Thomas E Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thomas> give an example of how it's broken.
I never managed to track it down precisely. But for instance with
Bison and a2ps, the only problems I has with gettext 0.10.33 were
people using HPUX Make. For a time I tried to find the o
| Hi,
| Thanks for replying.
|
| But I am getting the error even if I use the gmake.
|
| Making all in .
| gmake[1]: Entering directory `/home/praveen/automake-1.4'
| gmake[1]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
| gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/
Hi,
>
> | Hi,
> | Thanks for replying.
> |
> | But I am getting the error even if I use the gmake.
> |
> | Making all in .
> | gmake[1]: Entering directory `/home/praveen/automake-1.4'
> | gmake[1]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
> | gmake[1]:
On Oct 17, 2000, "Paul F. Kunz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to allow the gcc developer to use automake dependency
> tracking, while the other developer uses some other system.
Use CVS automake. It's dependency tracking mechanism no longer
depends on GNU make nor GCC.
--
Alexan
> "Praveen" == Praveen Kumar Amritaluru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Praveen>As can be seen from the above message, there is no
Praveen> action associated with the targets. As a result nothing is
Praveen> getting done under these two directories m4 and tests.
That's right, nothing to
> > "Praveen" == Praveen Kumar Amritaluru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Praveen> As can be seen from the above message, there is no
> Praveen> action associated with the targets. As a result nothing is
> Praveen> getting done under these two directories m4 and tests.
>
> That's right
Hello!
> Pavel, you still consider this patch alive?
I've just applied it.
I'm sorry, this week is going to be very busy for me, but please consider
me alive anyway :-)
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
16 matches
Mail list logo
