-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 11.06.2013 20:16, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> Sorry for the dumb question, but: which version of Automake are
> you using? And: are you sure the ylwrap script are you using is
> actually in sync with that version?
Sorry for being unclear -- t
On 06/11/2013 07:57 PM, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a project where I let flex generate a header file -- however
> ylwrap throws this file away. According to bugs #8844 and #9933 this
> should work now -- is that a regression, or have the bugs been closed
> before the updated code made i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have a project where I let flex generate a header file -- however
ylwrap throws this file away. According to bugs #8844 and #9933 this
should work now -- is that a regression, or have the bugs been closed
before the updated code made it into a r
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 16:31:31 -0500 (CDT), Bob Friesenhahn
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Adam Monsen wrote:
>
> > Could we please get some anti-spam protection on this mailing list?
> > There's almost more noise than signal.
>
> I don't
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Adam Monsen wrote:
Could we please get some anti-spam protection on this mailing list?
There's almost more noise than signal.
I don't see this noise since I use bogofilter to filter out almost all
SPAM (500-1000 SPAM messages/day). However, recently I have
encoun
Could we please get some anti-spam protection on this mailing list?
There's almost more noise than signal.
--
Adam Monsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://adammonsen.com/
The best way we suggest to solve email spam maybe is not only base on opti-in or
opti-out problem.
In fact,opti-out law will cause the increase of spam in internet.
We must force the e-business base on
"what's you need and good communicate with each other?" to avoid the sp
on la
complacencia de la nueva legislacion sobre correo electrónico: Por sección
301, parrafo (a) (2) (c) de S.1618 Bajo el decreto S.1618 Título 3ro
Aprobado por el 105 Congreso base de las normativas internacionales sobre
SPAM, este mail no podra ser considerado SPAM mientras incluya una forma d
>>> "Bob" == Bob Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bob> Hi,
Bob> Is there some sort of Email filter you guys could use to
Bob> keep spam at a minimum. It seems like the automake mailing list
Bob> recieves a lot of spam ( in comparison to other mailing l
Hi,
Is there some sort of Email filter you guys could use to
keep spam at a minimum. It seems like the automake mailing list
recieves a lot of spam ( in comparison to other mailing lists ).
Bob Rossi
rently only allows the list admin to hold messages, which then have to be
> reviewed by a human.
It's not a software limitation; it's FSF policy. See:
http://www.gnu.org/prep/mailinglists.html#Spam
It would seem that automated filtering is unacceptable to them,
whether content-
Dan> IMHO the mailing list should reject messages from nonsubscribers.
Dan> I thought it already did.
I agree, however I think the current stable version of Mailman (2.0.x)
currently only allows the list admin to hold messages, which then have to be
reviewed by a human. I don't know if
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 03:54:52PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> IMHO the mailing list should reject messages from nonsubscribers.
> I thought it already did.
Every project considering doing this needs to ask themselves whether
they are prepared to miss out on bug reports as a result. This is a fact
n' subject lines and
animations
of people f**king landing in my mailbox... anything to stop
spam is all right by me.
- Dan
-Original Message-
From: Justin Kirby
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 5/14/2002 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: spam
I recently subscribed to this list, because of some issues I
l Roskin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> [Sorry for offtopic, but since Christoph wants to discuss this in the
> list, I don't want readers to see only his replies, but not mine]
>
> > proski> Install a spam filter. I use SpamAssassin. You can download it from
> > proski> http://sp
Hi!
[Sorry for offtopic, but since Christoph wants to discuss this in the
list, I don't want readers to see only his replies, but not mine]
> proski> Install a spam filter. I use SpamAssassin. You can download it from
> proski> http://spamassassin.org/
>
> Not everyb
proski> Install a spam filter. I use SpamAssassin. You can download it
proski> from http://spamassassin.org/
christoph> Not everybody has the possibility to install a filter (i am
christoph> not the system administrator)
I use SA. With its default settings many o
proski> Install a spam filter. I use SpamAssassin. You can download it from
proski> http://spamassassin.org/
Not everybody has the possibility to install a filter (i am not the system
administrator)
proski> Please keep in mind that Automake developers don't have access
Hello,
i am going to leave this list because it is not acceptable to receive hundrets
of spam mails through [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bye,
Christoph
Bruce> I'm usually pretty tolerant because I have decent filters
Bruce> and a DSL pipe, but this is extreme and needs to be stopped:
Talk to the FSF sysadmins. There's nothing I can do about it.
Tom
that having the lists completely open is a good idea
with the amount of spam nowadays. Only allowing subscribers to post
(like on SourceForge) would stop virtually all spam, and anyone who
wants to post justs needs to subscribe (like everyone who wants to
recieve the list). IIRC all posts from non
I'm usually pretty tolerant because I have decent filters
and a DSL pipe, but this is extreme and needs to be stopped:
$ egrep '^(Sender|Date):' nsmail/Dubious
Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 22:42:56 -0400
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 22:55:41 -0400
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri
On Thu, 2002-01-31 at 06:41, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > It is possible to set up moderation. Actually, moderation is a wrong
> > word. The only responsibility of the moderator show be preventing spam.
>
> I help moderate a few of the GNU lists which are moderated solely to
> p
> It is possible to set up moderation. Actually, moderation is a wrong
> word. The only responsibility of the moderator show be preventing spam.
I help moderate a few of the GNU lists which are moderated solely to
prevent spam and I can tell you from personal experience that it is
> There is no point in debating about spam here, it becomes spam by
> itself.
Especially if you receive every e-mail twice...
Frank
Francis James Franklin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's getting them wrong that is living, getting them wrong and wrong and
wrong and then, on careful reco
. Details here:
Rupert>http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#rbl-sucks
There is no point in debating about spam here, it becomes spam by
itself. What is needed is someone that manages to convince the FSF to
protect their machines. I tried, and never got answers.
Finally, making these list
Lars J. Aas wrote:
> : Why not close the list then? IMHO it's so easy and fast to join the
> : list so that requiring that you are a member if you want to post is
> : OK.
>
> I wouldn't mind this personally, but I seem to remember there were
> some strong opinions against this the last time it w
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 09:23:56AM +0100, Mats Lidell wrote:
: >>>>> Lars wrote:
: Lars> [...] it's impossible (or close to) to stop the spam that
: Lars> currently gets through without closing the list so only
: Lars> subscribers can post
:
: Why not close the lis
>>>>> Lars wrote:
Lars> [...] it's impossible (or close to) to stop the spam that
Lars> currently gets through without closing the list so only
Lars> subscribers can post
Why not close the list then? IMHO it's so easy and fast to join the
list so that requiring
Have a look at `spamassassin', it works great. Look at the following
folder, last erased Jan 12th, which it made thanks to the following
bits of .procmailrc:
:0fw
| spamassassin -P
:0e
{
EXITCODE=$?
}
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Flag: YES
caughtspam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Get ready to see BIGGEST
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 08:10:25AM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
: Hello!
:
: > We've stopped most of the shit from Korea based on simple filtering, but
: > it's impossible (or close to) to stop the spam that currently gets through
: > without closing the list so only subs
Hello!
> We've stopped most of the shit from Korea based on simple filtering, but
> it's impossible (or close to) to stop the spam that currently gets through
> without closing the list so only subscribers can post or moderating the
> postings from non-subscribers. Nobod
> We've stopped most of the shit from Korea based on simple filtering
Thank you for that, at least.
> BTW, it's driving me nuts too, but I'm out of filtering ideas...
Allow only messages containing the line "Dear Automake,"? Maybe not.
Regards, Frank
Francis James Franklin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 09:46:26AM +, F J Franklin wrote:
: Please do something about this deluge of spam! It's driving me nuts!
We've stopped most of the shit from Korea based on simple filtering, but
it's impossible (or close to) to stop the spam that currently gets through
Please do something about this deluge of spam! It's driving me nuts!
Sorely aggravated,
Frank
Francis James Franklin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's getting them wrong that is living, getting them wrong and wrong and
wrong and then, on careful reconsideration, getting them wrong again.
Tha
> I'm not really comfortable modifying list settings on lists I'm not
> "affiliated with", even if I could. The maintainers for those lists
> should just pick it up from the mailman settings for the autoconf list...
> (It's in the Privacy Settings section).
bounce_matching_headers for [EMAIL PRO
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 12:36:49PM -0400, Derek Robert Price wrote:
: "Lars J. Aas" wrote:
: > I've installed an experimental filter on the autoconf list which I will
: > monitor for the next couple of days. If it's successful, adding it to
: > automake list should be a piece of cake.
:
: If the
"Lars J. Aas" wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 11:03:45AM +0100, Lars Hecking wrote:
> :
> : http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/automake/2001-September/date.html
> :
> : What a sad sight: fully one third of all list messages for this month
> : are spam. Other lists at
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 11:03:45AM +0100, Lars Hecking wrote:
:
: http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/automake/2001-September/date.html
:
: What a sad sight: fully one third of all list messages for this month
: are spam. Other lists at gnu.org (and elsewhere) have been hit just
: the same
http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/automake/2001-September/date.html
What a sad sight: fully one third of all list messages for this month
are spam. Other lists at gnu.org (and elsewhere) have been hit just
the same.
Is anyone at gnu.org going to do something about this?
If the list software
>>>>> "Stephan" == Stephan Kulow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Maybe we could convince the GNU sysadmins to turn on spam blocking.
Stephan> Speaking as mail admin for @kde.org I can only tell you that
Stephan> this is impossible.
I disagree. On sour
equires that all posters are members of the list.
>
> We can't move the list.
>
> Maybe we could convince the GNU sysadmins to turn on spam blocking.
>
Speaking as mail admin for @kde.org I can only tell you that this is impossible.
The only way would be what Allan suggested
ist.
We can't move the list.
Maybe we could convince the GNU sysadmins to turn on spam blocking.
Tom
rship in the list before you can post.
FYC
Allan
John Poltorak wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 06:36:54PM +0900, DZ>F0!18 wrote:
>
> Can someone stop this spam getting in here?
>
> --
> John
44 matches
Mail list logo
