Ok, thanks a lot for your explanations. That helped me to clarify my own
understanding! :-)
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Vlad,
* Vlad Skvortsov wrote on Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 11:59:46PM CET:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Vlad Skvortsov wrote on Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 11:46:46PM CET:
Ok
Hi Vlad,
* Vlad Skvortsov wrote on Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 11:59:46PM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >* Vlad Skvortsov wrote on Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 11:46:46PM CET:
> >
> >>Ok, I believe I have to explain more here. My product is deemed to be
> >>self-contained: no dependencies on external shared l
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Vlad,
* Vlad Skvortsov wrote on Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 11:46:46PM CET:
Ok, I believe I have to explain more here. My product is deemed to be
self-contained: no dependencies on external shared libraries, nothing. I
build all my [C] applications static. However, recen
Hi Vlad,
* Vlad Skvortsov wrote on Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 11:46:46PM CET:
>
> Ok, I believe I have to explain more here. My product is deemed to be
> self-contained: no dependencies on external shared libraries, nothing. I
> build all my [C] applications static. However, recently a need has
> ari
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Vlad,
* Vlad Skvortsov wrote on Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 06:02:21AM CET:
And another question: I have a third-party library that I link my
project against. That one is declared (by its author) to be shared.
However, when I build that, I always end up with all both sha
Hi Vlad,
* Vlad Skvortsov wrote on Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 06:02:21AM CET:
>
> And another question: I have a third-party library that I link my
> project against. That one is declared (by its author) to be shared.
> However, when I build that, I always end up with all both shared
> (.so/.dylib)
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
You make the other libraries into `convenience archives'. These are
documented in both
*snip*
Oh, I've overlooked that.. Actually I though that the way objects are
packed into particular library is defined in the target library rules
and not in dependent ones.
Ye
Hi Vlad,
* Vlad Skvortsov wrote on Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 05:34:04AM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >* Vlad Skvortsov wrote on Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 08:01:45AM CET:
> >>
> >>How can I achieve that?
> >
> >You make the other libraries into `convenience archives'. These are
> >documented in both
*sni
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Vlad,
* Vlad Skvortsov wrote on Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 08:01:45AM CET:
I use automake/libtool environment for a project with couple of dozens
of libraries. I link those libraries statically into the binaries that
are then distributed. It works ok.
What I need now is
Vlad Skvortsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When I use something like this:
>
> lib_LT_LIBRARIES = libbig.la
> libbig_la_LIBADD = .../libaaa.la .../li.la .../libccc.la
>
> I end up with the shared library that contains _references_ to _shared_
> libraries aaa, bbb and ccc. But I just want th
Hi Vlad,
* Vlad Skvortsov wrote on Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 08:01:45AM CET:
>
> I use automake/libtool environment for a project with couple of dozens
> of libraries. I link those libraries statically into the binaries that
> are then distributed. It works ok.
>
> What I need now is to create a sh
[please cc: me, I'm not on the list]
Hi!
I use automake/libtool environment for a project with couple of dozens
of libraries. I link those libraries statically into the binaries that
are then distributed. It works ok.
What I need now is to create a shared library that would contain a
subset
12 matches
Mail list logo
