> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robert> However there is still a problem:
Robert> make dist doesn't create directory foo.
This is a bug.
>> 2) Do the stub directories such as foo, which only have 2 or three c
>> files need Makefile.am's ?
Robert> I take it the answ
Alexandre> There's an automake option that tells it to keep object
Alexandre> files in subdirs. I don't recall the exact spelling.
Akim> Couldn't find it in the doc (probably still too experimental?),
Akim> but a RTFC shows it's subdir-objects. See the subobj*.test
Akim> files.
That's a genero
- Original Message -
From: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alexandre Oliva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 12:56 AM
Subject: Re: make dist and
- Original Message -
From: "Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 5:34 PM
Subject: Re: make dist and sources in subdirs
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 09:20:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 09:20:46AM +0200, Lars J. Aas wrote:
: On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 08:33:52AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
: : I take it the answer to this is "yes it solves creating the directory?"
: : The reason why I was hoping to avoid a Makefile is that it saves a level
: : of recursion d
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 08:33:52AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
: I take it the answer to this is "yes it solves creating the directory?"
: The reason why I was hoping to avoid a Makefile is that it saves a level
: of recursion during make, and on cygwin that saves time.
I'm doing the same thing
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 11:46 PM
Subject: make dist and sources in subdirs
> I have three questions:
>
> 1) Based on a recent comment on this list,
> I ha
> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexandre> On Apr 3, 2001, "Robert Collins"
Alexandre> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is it expected behaviour for a.o,b.o ans c.o from the above example
>> to be created in ., or in foo/ ?
Alexandre> Yep
(Alexandre means `yes, in
On Apr 3, 2001, "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it expected behaviour for a.o,b.o ans c.o from the above example to
> be created in ., or in foo/ ?
Yep
> It would be good if they could be created in foo/ rather than the
> current directory (in case of name collisions.
There's
I have three questions:
1) Based on a recent comment on this list,
I have
noinst_LIBRARIES = libfoo.a
lib_foo_a_SOURCES = foo/a.c foo/b.c foo/c.c
upon entering this particular directory, make dist does:
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `foo.c', needed by `distdir'. Stop.
make[2]: Leaving di
10 matches
Mail list logo
