> On 22 Oct 2023, at 22:28, Karl Berry wrote:
>
>While libtool has a new maintainer (Alex Ameen), essentially nothing
>happens, which is quite unfortunate...
>
> 1) libtool 2.4.7 was released in March 2022
correct.
However https://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/
still says:
Latest stab
> While libtool has a new maintainer (Alex Ameen), essentially
> nothing happens, which is quite unfortunate...
>
> 1) libtool 2.4.7 was released in March 2022 (I don't know if Alex did
>it),
He did.
> 2) When a package appears to be unmaintained, the first thing to do
>[...]
While libtool has a new maintainer (Alex Ameen), essentially nothing
happens, which is quite unfortunate...
1) libtool 2.4.7 was released in March 2022 (I don't know if Alex did
it), which isn't so terribly long ago. Sure, maintainers should at least
confirm bug reports and patches, even i
Great! Thanks!
On Sun, 2023-10-22 at 15:02 +, Shterenlikht, Anton wrote:
> I confirm that the patch still works against
> today's git version:
>
> $ libtool --version
> libtool (GNU libtool) 2.4.7.4-1ec8f
>
> I just added "flang*" in addition to "armflang*":
>
> https://savannah.gnu.org/sup
I confirm that the patch still works against
today's git version:
$ libtool --version
libtool (GNU libtool) 2.4.7.4-1ec8f
I just added "flang*" in addition to "armflang*":
https://savannah.gnu.org/support/index.php?110947
I'm also asking in libt...@gnu.org why 2.4.6 is still
the latest stable r
> here is a patch for libtool that Francois Coppens and I submitted to
> libtool in February. I think we did something went wrong in the PR
> process because it has still not been included... [...]
While libtool has a new maintainer (Alex Ameen), essentially nothing
happens, which is quite unfor
gt; However, this crude hack will not work with "make distcheck",
> because it will generate a new libtool.
>
> Still, I'm trying to understand if this is a bug in autotools,
> and if there is a workaround via edits in configure.ac and/or
> Makefile.am.
>
> Thank
Karl, thank you
I submitted a bug report with a reproducer:
https://savannah.gnu.org/support/index.php?110947
Anton
> On 21 Oct 2023, at 22:48, Karl Berry wrote:
>
> Hi Anton - thanks for the report.
>
>https://github.com/HDFGroup/hdf5/issues/366
>with the solution that "-Wl," must
Hi Anton - thanks for the report.
https://github.com/HDFGroup/hdf5/issues/366
with the solution that "-Wl," must be prepended somehow to "-soname".
Why do you think this is not a libtool issue? Isn't it libtool's job to
figure out the arguments that need to be passed? The fact that the -
[also posted in libt...@gnu.org]
Please help me understand how to deal correctly with this error:
libtool: link: armflang -shared-g -soname libp2.so.0
-o .libs/libp2.so.0.0.0
armflang: error: unknown argument: '-soname'
I see this issue mentioned in multiple places, e
akefile.am.
Thank you
Anton
> On 20 Oct 2023, at 08:40, Shterenlikht, Anton
> wrote:
>
> [also posted in libt...@gnu.org]
>
> Please help me understand how to deal correctly with this error:
>
> libtool: link: armflang -shared-g -soname
> libp2.so.0 -
11 matches
Mail list logo
