Earnie Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-07 11:39:37 -0500]:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Otherwise, I'm also subscribed on the list, so no need to CC me in every
> >post :-)
Then set M-F-T in your postings.
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> It is a function of the mail client "Reply-All"
Earnie Boyd writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >Otherwise, I'm also subscribed on the list, so no need to CC me in every
> >post :-)
>
> It is a function of the mail client "Reply-All" event to add you in the
> distribution of the response. If you don't wish personal copies as well
> as l
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Otherwise, I'm also subscribed on the list, so no need to CC me in every
post :-)
It is a function of the mail client "Reply-All" event to add you in the
distribution of the response. If you don't wish personal copies as well
as list copies then it is upto you to set
Well, I guess we all got smarter on the tripple -I. issue. Thanks!
Otherwise, I'm also subscribed on the list, so no need to CC me in every
post :-)
.
--
Miki Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Coder - Unixophile - Boarder - Quake God
Aladdin Knowledge Systems
---
On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 12:57, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> >>> "Tim" == Tim Van Holder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Tim> On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 11:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> DEFAULT_INCLUDES = -I. -I$(srcdir) -I.
> >>
> >> This raises 2 questions in itself:
> >> a. what's wrong wit
>>> "Tim" == Tim Van Holder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tim> On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 11:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> DEFAULT_INCLUDES = -I. -I$(srcdir) -I.
>>
>> This raises 2 questions in itself:
>> a. what's wrong with "DEFAULT_INCLUDES = -I. -I$(srcdir)"
Tim> Don't know that,
The th
On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 11:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> DEFAULT_INCLUDES = -I. -I$(srcdir) -I.
>
> This raises 2 questions in itself:
> a. what's wrong with "DEFAULT_INCLUDES = -I. -I$(srcdir)"
Don't know that,
> or, since
> my project's sources all lie in the root (as much as I'd have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Wow, that saves me dual implementation of 'debug' and 'release' make
> targets. cool :-)
>
> Yet 2 more newbie questions:
>
> Q1. Why do I get:
> -I. -I. -I.
> when make runs gcc?
> peekeing in the Makefile.in reveals:
>
> DEFAULT_INCLUDES = -I. -I$(srcdir) -I.
>
Wow, that saves me dual implementation of 'debug' and 'release' make
targets. cool :-)
Yet 2 more newbie questions:
Q1. Why do I get:
-I. -I. -I.
when make runs gcc?
peekeing in the Makefile.in reveals:
DEFAULT_INCLUDES = -I. -I$(srcdir) -I.
This raises 2 questions in itself:
a. what's
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 07:35:11AM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> Akim Demaille wrote:
> >>"Bob" == Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Bob> CFLAGS=-O CXXFLAGS=-O ./configure
> >
> > ./configure CFLAGS=-O CXXFLAGS=-O
> >
> > is better.
>
> because it then becomes a part of conf
Akim Demaille wrote:
"Bob" == Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bob> If you want to change this you can set CXXFLAGS at configure
Bob> time.
Bob> CFLAGS=-O CXXFLAGS=-O ./configure
./configure CFLAGS=-O CXXFLAGS=-O
is better.
because it then becomes a part of config.status w
> "Bob" == Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bob> If you want to change this you can set CXXFLAGS at configure
Bob> time.
Bob> CFLAGS=-O CXXFLAGS=-O ./configure
./configure CFLAGS=-O CXXFLAGS=-O
is better.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-04 12:43:48 +0200]:
> Small question:
>
> Why do my autoconf-generated configure scripts automatically fit in
> debugging info "-g -O2" (or -g if I ask nicely?)
> When I compile release versions of my code, how do I (elegantly) ask
> automake, or rath
13 matches
Mail list logo
