Re: libtool verbosity

2004-05-20 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Thu, 20 May 2004, Albert Chin wrote: > On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 11:24:49AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > > On Mon, 17 May 2004, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > > I was expecting this sort of answer, but was hoping that then I would > > > also get a pointer to how else to possibly achieve the same t

Re: libtool verbosity

2004-05-20 Thread Albert Chin
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 11:24:49AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > On Mon, 17 May 2004, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > I was expecting this sort of answer, but was hoping that then I would > > also get a pointer to how else to possibly achieve the same thing. > > For the package I support, I added a co

Re: libtool verbosity

2004-05-17 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Mon, 17 May 2004, Jan Beulich wrote: > I was expecting this sort of answer, but was hoping that then I would > also get a pointer to how else to possibly achieve the same thing. For the package I support, I added a configure option to enable verbose libtool output. Libtool is executed in sile

Re: libtool verbosity

2004-05-17 Thread Jan Beulich
I was expecting this sort of answer, but was hoping that then I would also get a pointer to how else to possibly achieve the same thing. Thanks, Jan >>> Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 17.05.04 16:41:15 >>> On Mon, 17 May 2004, Jan Beulich wrote: > Wouldn't it make sense to have automake gene

Re: libtool verbosity

2004-05-17 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Mon, 17 May 2004, Jan Beulich wrote: > Wouldn't it make sense to have automake generate the LIBTOOL variable by > default so that libtool's verbosity matches that of make, i.e. by > something like > > LIBTOOL = @LIBTOOL@ $(if $(findstring s,$(filter-out > --%,$(MAKEFLAGS))),--silent) This look