On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 11:24:49AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > On Mon, 17 May 2004, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > I was expecting this sort of answer, but was hoping that then I would > > also get a pointer to how else to possibly achieve the same thing. > > For the package I support, I added a configure option to enable > verbose libtool output. Libtool is executed in silent mode by default > since it is assumed that maintainers/porters are the only ones who > really need the extra information.
Why would anyone want silent output? Surely someone building your tool would be interested in errors during a build, rather than rebuilding from scratch to find out what went wrong? -- albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
