Can I actually rely on Automake making a verbatim
copy of the include line from Makefile.am to Makefile.im?
As far as I can make out, your logic is exactly correct. Looking at
the bin/automake script, I see:
my $PATH_PATTERN = '(\w|[+/.-])+';
# This will pass through anything not of the p
On 2022-11-22 18:32 -0700, Karl Berry wrote:
> Hi Hans - first, congratulations on getting this to work at all.
Thank you for your kind and thorough reply.
> I don't recall anyone else undertaking this.
And that might be why I could not find anybody else doing auto
dependency tracking in Makef
Hi Hans - first, congratulations on getting this to work at all.
I don't recall anyone else undertaking this. I'm afraid I don't have any
particular insights, but just so you know someone read your mail:
Question: Is it OK for me to hook into ./$(DEPDIR)/ at all?
I could use
> "Tom" == Tom Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom> Is there anything known to be non-portable about this technique
Tom> for generating a list of all included files?
Yes.
Tom>cc [-I options] -E
Tom>| sed -e '{
Tom>/^#[[:space:]]\{1,\}[[:digit:]]\{1,\}[[:space:]]\{
> "Johannes" == Kremp, Johannes (Extern) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Johannes> sorry for this question, but where can i get cvs automake?
Start at the home page.
http://sources.redhat.com/automake/
Tom
Johannes> hi, is there a patch which make it possible to make
Johannes> dependency-tracking with other compiler than 'gcc'?
This is one of the major new features in the cvs automake.
sorry for this question, but where can i get cvs automake?
johannes
> "Johannes" == Kremp, Johannes (Extern) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Johannes> hi, is there a patch which make it possible to make
Johannes> dependency-tracking with other compiler than 'gcc'?
This is one of the major new features in the cvs automake.
Tom
