Re: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL vs. AM_PROG_LIBTOOL in automake-1.4.a

2000-03-01 Thread mdejonge
Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > On Mar 1, 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Shouldn't automake issue a warning like: > >automake: configure.in: installing `./ltconf' > > as it does for other missing files? > > No, because ltconfig is not part of automake, it's part of libtool. > You should r

Re: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL vs. AM_PROG_LIBTOOL in automake-1.4.a

2000-03-01 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Mar 1, 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Shouldn't automake issue a warning like: >automake: configure.in: installing `./ltconf' > as it does for other missing files? No, because ltconfig is not part of automake, it's part of libtool. You should run libtoolize for that. In fact, IIRC, au

AC_PROG_LIBTOOL vs. AM_PROG_LIBTOOL in automake-1.4.a

2000-03-01 Thread mdejonge
Hi, I'm using automake-1.4a (obtained from the CVS repository) and encounter the following problem in combination with libtool: When using AM_PROG_LIBTOOL in configure.in, automake complains configure.in: 10: `AM_PROG_LIBTOOL' is obsolete, use `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' instead But when using AC_PROG