Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> On Mar 1, 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Shouldn't automake issue a warning like:
> > automake: configure.in: installing `./ltconf'
> > as it does for other missing files?
>
> No, because ltconfig is not part of automake, it's part of libtool.
> You should run libtoolize for that. In fact, IIRC, automake --add
> does run libtoolize to do that.
automake -a was exactly what I was running and which caused
the warning.
What makes things even worse is that automake-1.4a (and its
m4 macro's probably) yields an incorrect configure script.
The generated configure script does not run on Linux and
netbsd. automake-1.4 in combination with exactly the same
version of libtool does not produce an incorrect configure
script.
Any ideas about what is going wrong?
Thank in advance,
Merijn
--
Merijn de Jonge email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel: (+31) 20 592 6051 www:
http://www.cwi.nl/~mdejonge/
