Re: ##-xxx-xxx.patch

2001-02-22 Thread Allan Clark
Akim, everyone; Is there I way I can simply get the discussion, without the binary/patch traffic? I would prefer to receive this kind of thing through an update from a source-control (ie CVS) than copies from email. Should I sign up on a different list? Should [EMAIL PROTECTED] be formed? All

Re: ##-xxx-xxx.patch

2001-02-21 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello, Allan! On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Allan Clark wrote: > Akim, everyone; I'm rather everyone than Akim, but anyway :-) > Is there I way I can simply get the discussion, without the binary/patch > traffic? I would prefer to receive this kind of thing through an update > from a source-control (i

Re: ##-xxx-xxx.patch

2001-02-21 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Pavel" == Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Pavel> It should be [EMAIL PROTECTED] for consistency with Pavel> Autoconf. ... and every other project in existence. This change is fine with me. Someone else has to create the list though. Can it be archived at GNU? If not, tell me