[Moved to Automake List]
On Jul 31, 2013, at 8:00 AM, Peng Yu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 31, 2013, at 5:15 AM, Peng Yu wrote:
>>> http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Creating-amhello.html
>&
Hello Mr. Strike,
On Oct 18, 2012, at 7:16 PM, NightStrike wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>> Thanks to everyone for your feedback. Much appreciated.
>>
>> It seems that merging libtool into Automake would be an unpopular move all
>&g
hear.
On 17 Oct 2012, at 20:57, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>>
>> Libtool is just (a complicated) compiler wrapper, to make building and
>> linking against libraries easy to specify... be that on the command
>> line with a di
Hi Stefano,
On 17 Oct 2012, at 16:45, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On 10/17/2012 11:24 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>> On 17 Oct 2012, at 15:52, Stefano Lattarini
>> wrote:
>>> On 10/17/2012 10:25 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>>>> I remember many years ago that T
ikely after the next release.
Thoughts?
Cheers,
--
Gary V. Vaughan (gary AT gnu DOT org)
Hi Stefano,
Thanks for the fast response!
On 17 Oct 2012, at 15:52, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> [Adding Automake list in CC:]
>
> Reference:
> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-patches/2012-10/msg00018.html>
>
> On 10/17/2012 10:25 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote
> +make implementations that do not accept macros in targets.
>>
>> I suppose we can resuscitate make portability if anyone complains loudly
>> enough. We may want to also ask on the automake list if this is still a
>> real limitation, or whether automake has given up on worrying about this
>> as well.
>>
> See above.
When my Internet comes back reliably and I can do more than just put mail in
qmail's queue for the next time I have a bit of bandwidth, I'll make sure to
test the HEAD of libtool master on the architectures I have access to, including
both HP/UX and IRIX.
Cheers,
--
Gary V. Vaughan (gary AT gnu DOT org)
Thanks for the heads up before releasing with 1.11a though.
Cheers,
--
Gary V. Vaughan (g...@gnu.org)
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ing AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([1.11a]) in libtool's
configure.ac? Pity Automake doesn't use gnulibs `git-version-gen' so
that I could specify the particular revision with the compile script
patch that we want at libtool bootstrap time.
Cheers,
--
Gary V. Vaughan (g...@gnu.org)
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
t to look into storing the dependencies in make
variables.
HTH,
--
Gary V. Vaughan (g...@gnu.org)
I got errors when I do the cross compile for powerpc. Below are the error
messages. It looks for /usr/lib/libltdl.so instead of
/tools/eldk/4.2/ppc_4xx/usr/lib/libltdl.so at link time. I set the path
-L/tools/eldk/4.2/ppc_4xx/usr/lib. But, it is useless. Below are details.
Before running ./con
Ralf
All in all, everything does seem to be working now, which is very cool,
and thanks for the help.
--
Gary Kramlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Gary,
* Gary Kramlich wrote on Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 03:08:38AM CEST:
This python script also determines what directories should have
makefiles created and so on. I've gotten far enough to trick configure
into outputting all of the make files. (This is do
n't keep it's
build system the way it is.
If examples are needed, please let me know so I can provide them.
Thanks,
--
Gary Kramlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ake supports the `.' option in SUBDIRS.
Probably not. You are fighting against all the bugs and misfeatures that
have been fixed over the last five years of automake development if you
insist on staying with automake-1.4 (I branched for the 1.4px series in
early 2001).
HTH,
/Makefile])
FYI, you'll need to run 'autoreconf -fvi' in the project $top_srcdir
afterwards to generate tops/Makefile.in.
HTH,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://blog.azazil.net
GNU Hacker / )= http
o
> do it. Is it possible?
$ ../path/to/configure --prefix=/path/to/X11R6/root/directory
$ make
$ su
# make install
HTH,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/
it doesn't seem to work.
>
> Can anyone tell me the correct way to create a non-recursive automake
> system, which might have identically named source files?
In your configure.ac, make sure AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE is given the
subdir-objects option (you'll also need a recent automake
g.
I've just update the links from http://sources.redhat.com/autobook/download.html
to give the option of downloading a modernised version of some of the examples,
including a new convenience-2.0. Please give it a try.
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],g
But in *one* Makefile.am. How do I do it?
AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS = subdir-objects
lib_LTLIBRARIES = libmain.la modules/libmod.la
libmain_la_SOURCES = main1.c main2.c
modules_libmod_la_SOURCES = modules/mod1.c modules/mod2.c
HTH,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gn
ddir).
> However, in my real project I have hundreds of such files with hundreds of
> such locations. I would quickly hit the limit on command-line arguments.
>
> How should I fix this problem?
In src/Makefile.am:
AM_CPPFLAGS = -I$(srcdir)/../include -I../include
Or if include and src a
t
> be helpful!
Argh, the attached wrapper appears to be clearing LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Are
you using fast-install mode (./configure --enable-fast-install)? Does
the autogen binary install without needing to be relinked? What architecture
are you running all of this on at the moment?
Cheers,
b/libfoo.la
HTH,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
akefile.am:4: did you mean `lib_gvmodule.la'?
You should also add:
_gvmodule_la_LDFLAGS = -module
_gtkmissing_la_LDFLAGS = -module
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker
when you committed them last when you check them out.
Thus, you set them up and commit them to the trunk. All is well with
the auto-tools. Then copy to your branch/tag. When you check them out
you'll get the same timestamp if as when you committed them if you have
this option set.
--
Gary Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MLB Associates
Stepan Kasal wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Stephan!
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 10:25:32AM +, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>
>>Where do we send it? Direct to rms?
>
>
> I'd say assign or copyright-clerk are better (at gnu.org, of course).
Those aren't the actual legal g
Paul Eggert wrote:
"Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Now for the note to the FSF that explains why we need it... here
is a first cut to get the ball rolling:
That looks fine to me. Thanks.
Okay, there have been no corrections or objections in the last 24 hours...
Whe
you may distribute this file and the derived files
Paul> for that purpose, under the same terms that you use for
Paul> the rest of the package.
[...]
President Eggert, you have my vote!
Seconded :-)
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scien
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
"Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Gary> The use of GNU Autoconf is to prevent someone creating their
Gary> own tool and calling that Autoconf to circumvent the license.
I don't have a problem with GNU Autoconf, only
use.
"or any derived output" is a lame attempt to allow tools such as
aclocal (without singling out aclocal) to preprocess the file,
as long as the intent is to build a configure script.
I prefer my wording :-)
Bruce's would be kinda cool too. But frankly, I'd be flabb
Paul Eggert wrote:
"Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Was anybody unhappy with the exception wording in my last post in the
> thread? If not we can start from there.
I worry that it's too generous, because it means that if the package
uses the .m4 f
Paul Eggert wrote:
"Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
However, even though our intentions are good, and we are merely
clarifying the existing spirit of the exception clauses we have used
all along, is it okay to just edit the license of existing files without
explicit
On second thoughts, why not take this opportunity to unify the license
exception between libtool and automake so we can share code more easily?
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
"Paul" == Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Paul> Would you use the ex
e the resulting output file without
restriction.
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.
e. Arguably libltdl/Makefile.am has
ancestry from before I joined libtool, but the clause was already present
in the libtool license when libltdl was added, so there is no
problem in adding the clause back in.
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED
me how to?
If you are running a reasonable implementation of make (eg GNU Make):
make -n install
will show the commands that would be executed without actually running
them.
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '
Hallo!
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Alexandre Duret-Lutz writes:
>
>>>>> "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> because AM_PROG_CC_C_O horribly
>> overwrites CC, it's not clear to me whether
>>
>> AM_PROG_CC_C_O
Salut Alexandre!
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
>>>>"Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Gary> My feeling at the moment is that it would be a small price to pay for
> Gary> simplifying the interface to automake (i.e. _not_ being s
Thomas Degris wrote:
> I guess this is not an automake question but I would like to know how I
> can disable static build by default (I mean activate the
> --disable-static by default) when running configure.
http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual.html#IDX79
--
Gary V
Albert Chin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 02:49:05PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>
>>It may be small consolation, but the next release of GNU m4 has the last
>>bit of functionality required to eliminate aclocal entirely.
>
> How does it do that? If the .m4 file
LOCAL_AMFLAGS in the toplevel Makefile.am and
>>autoreconf will take care of everything.
>
>
> Thanks. However, I prefer a solution where I didn't have to modify the
> source if I modified the scripts used to build the software.
It may be small consolation, but the next
hould support this by default (if it doesn't already)...
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ ht
-b -c d"
>
> For a large part of the project the CFLAGS are fine but a few files
> cannot have '-c'.
>
> How do I remove it safely without redefinine CFLAGS within the
> Makefile.am file?
object_that_breaks_with_c_CFLAGS = -a -b -d
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>
>>
>> Okay. But for a project built with `make -j', we still need
>> AM_PROG_CC_C_O
>> and _LT_COMPILER_C_O to understand each others' locks :-(
>>
>>> [...]
&g
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
>>>>"Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> Gary> So does that simply mean that libtool objects can be correctly built
> Gary> as subdir-objects without AM_PROG_CC_C_O? Sorry to bug yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Salut!
On 7 Sep 2004, at 22:03, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
"Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Gary> Do we need to patch automake to accept LT_INIT for
Gary> subdir-objects projects, or do you think AC_PROG_C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Salut Alexandre!
Welcome back. Hope you enjoyed your vacation :-)
On 7 Sep 2004, at 22:03, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
"Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 08:29:07PM +0100, Patrick Welc
Hi Bob!
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Gary V.Vaughan wrote:
> That sounds great, but in my case the input files are graphic image
> files so they would be rather unwieldy in here documents. Typically a
> file is read, processed using an algorithm, and then either
er than searched for in the source tree.
Maybe you can emulate that behaviour by making your test input into
here documents in the test scripts, without a whole scale move to
Autotest?
Cheers,
Gary.
- --
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '
automatically called by LT_INIT.
Do we need to patch automake to accept LT_INIT for subdir-objects projects,
or do you think AC_PROG_CC_C_O should be merged with _LT_COMPILER_C_O?
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/
noinst_DATA = lib.so
lib.so: lib.la
@rm -f $@
$(LN_S) .libs/$@ $@
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical A
n early 2001, and had
an uninstall bug similar to what you describe. Please upgrade to a recent
1.5.x release and try again. If you still experience problems, please
report them to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research
make triggers the right rules to rebuild it properly.
None of the automatic rebuild rules work:
] make
cd .. && /bin/sh /Users/gary/devel/savannah/libtool--devo--1.0/config/missing
--run automake-1.8c --gnits Makefile
configure.ac:179: required file `config/ltmain.sh' not found
make: *
/local/share/libtool/m4/ltsugar.m4
/usr/local/share/libtool/m4/ltversion.m4
Cheers,
Gary.
- --
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical A
last week:
http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2004-05/msg00053.html
Cheers,
Gary.
- --
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Au
m gcc object... ok
Any thoughts on why this happens just once, and the other times this test is
performed (during the same configure session) it works?
It was a bug, fixed in autoconf CVS by the patch in:
http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-patches/2004-04/msg00028.html
Cheers,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Salut Alexandre,
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
|>>>"Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Gary> Instead, I'd like to have LT_INIT perform the
| Gary> AC_SUBST([LIBTOOL_DEPS]), and Automake gener
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
|>>>"Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
|
| [...]
|
| Gary> should Automake be patched to accept `program_LDADD =
| Gary> -dlopen foo.la'?
|
| Sorry for the delay.
N
$(top_builddir)/config.status $(LIBTOOL_DEPS)
cd $(top_builddir) && $(SHELL) ./config.status $@
Does that seem like a sensible thing to want?
Cheers,
Gary.
- --
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://www.oranda.d
accepts these flags in `program_LDADD'. But hey!,
~ this is ugly!
I am unsure of the wisdom of these words. Should I change the manual to
wholeheartedly recommend the first alternative, and discard the others? Or
should Automake be patched to accept `program_LDADD = -dlopen foo.la
here.
Okay.
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
Hi Alexandre!
On Saturday, January 31, 2004, at 10:28 pm, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
That way, if `data.h' is required and `data.foo' is out of data, the
dependency on `data.c' will trigger the build.
That way, if `data.h' is required and `data.foo' is out of _date_,
On Tuesday, January 13, 2004, at 06:05 pm, Warren Turkal wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 13 January 2004 05:54 am, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Warren Turkal wrote:
| Is there any analysis on what it would take to create utility
programs
| that are only used during
| uses it during installation, but does not install it. I am under the
| impression that automake does not support this right now. What would be
| needed to add support for this feature.
Does this work?
nodist_PROGRAMS = installtool
install: installtool
- --
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL
g opinion on the linux-gnu argument, but I think your original comment
devalues config.guess unfairly.
Cheers,
Gary.
- --
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.g
real
problem, it can be fixed and patched up stream. config.guess is
without a doubt a very useful piece of code, and libtool is a prime
example where leveraging it has probably saved thousands of programmers
untold pain.
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECT
ther useful.
Cheers,
- --
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
V
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott James Remnant wrote:
| On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 15:49, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
|
|
|>Scott James Remnant wrote:
|>|On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 11:41, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
|>|> 1: remove $prefix/share/aclocal/l(ibtoo|td)l.m4 of old release
aclocal.m4
| cat: aclocal.m4: No such file or directory
|
| The problem is caused by the call to undefine, this loses the traced
| attribute.
You might try a CVS version of GNU m4... from the ChangeLog:
2001-10-10 Gary V. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
~The trace semantics now attach the tra
ion is the default, and overriding
must be specified.
Cheers,
Gary.
- --
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
| On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 08:49:04AM +, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
|
|>It would be great to have `LT_LDFLAGS = -module', rather than 15 lines of
|>`foo_LDFLAGS = -module' in a future m4 Makefile.am :-)
|
; risky.
Seconded!
It would be great to have `LT_LDFLAGS = -module', rather than 15 lines of
`foo_LDFLAGS = -module' in a future m4 Makefile.am :-)
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://www.oranda.demon.co.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
|>>>"Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
|
| Gary> Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
| >> How can automake determine whether the version of libtool used in
| >> a pac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
| How can automake determine whether the version of libtool used in
| a package supports --tag ?
test -n "`libtool --help | grep -- --tag=TAG`"
- --
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott James Remnant wrote:
| On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 11:41, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
|>libtool.m4 will be slowly crushed under the weight of its old releases.
|
| It stops us changing our AC_DEFUNs to m4_defines, yes. It wouldn't stop
| us remo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott James Remnant wrote:
| On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 13:27, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
|
|
|>Scott James Remnant wrote:
|>| The gotcha is that for some reason aclocal pulls in both m4/libtool.m4
|>| AND /usr/share/aclocal/libtool.m4 into aclocal.m4
er a few problems when I tried to convert M4 to a non-recursive
Makefile. I'd like to convert it now, but there are some issues that I
reported (maybe this is one actually).
Cheers,
Gary.
--
())_. Gary V. Vaughangary@(lilith.warpmail.net|gnu.org)
( '/ Research Scienti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[I'm forwarding this to the automake list for their consideration, I think
that is where the problem lies. You might tell them what version of automake
you are using. ~gary]
This is part of my Makefile.am for my test directory:
~ check_PRO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
cwilson wrote:
| Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
|> | ---
|> | When I configured using --disable-static --enable-shared:
|> |
|> | The build did not succeed. Apparently my fix to the global symbols
|> | filter wasn't good enou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
|
| | ---
| | When I configured using --enable-static --disable-shared:
| |
| | make install failed (actually, make install DESTDIR=...) because libtool
| | was looking for m4.exe in .libs, even though for static
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 11:02:04 -0700, "Kevin P. Fleming"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>
> > with the simpler:
> >
> > ~pkglibexec_LTLIBRARIES = gnu.la . traditional.la
> > ~AM_LDFLAGS = -module
> >
> &g
ve sources declarations are necessary, unless I rename all my source
files.
Can we have more realistic defaulting on names like this?
Cheers,
Gary.
- --
~ ())_. Gary V. Vaughangary@(lilith.warpmail.net|gnu.org)
~ ( '/ Research Scientist http://www.ora
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
"Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Gary> I got the ball rolling for this oft discussed macro by putting it in
Gary> autoconf and using it in libtoolize. My perl fu is insufficient to the
Gary> task of supporting
adds an appropriate -I to its
search path. Until then, this is just a wart!
Cheers,
Gary.
--
())_. Gary V. Vaughangary@(lilith.warpmail.net|gnu.org)
( '/ Research Scientist http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk ,_())
/ )= GNU Hacker http:
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
The only way I can think of doing this is with an install-exec-hook
that removes installed libraries if INSTALL_LIBS was not set:
if !INSTALL_LIBS
install-exec-hook:
$(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) uninstall-pkglibLTLIBRARIES
endif
But
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Completely untested, but have you tried:
pkglib_LTLIBRARIES =
noinst_LTLIBRARIES =
if INSTALL_LIBS
pkglib_LTLIBRARIES += $(LIBLIST)
else
noinst_LTLIBRARIES += $(LIBLIST)
endif
Just tried it, same results, automake reports each module in LIBLIST as
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Actually, you *do* need to install the libraries even if they are
linked into the program statically because libltdl looks up the
pseudolibrary (.la) in the module directory to get metadata about
(even preloaded) modules. Fixing this is on the
on the TODO list, but it is quite a big job and probably won't be fixed soon.
Cheers,
Gary.
--
())_. Gary V. Vaughangary@(lilith.warpmail.net|gnu.org)
( '/ Research Scientist http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk ,_())
/ )= GNU Hacker http://www.gnu.org/softw
h mangling. Provided
AC_CONFIG_M4_DIR([config]) expanded to (say) m4_prepend_search_path([config]),
and that happened before the first m4_include, it would work.
I'd quite like to sort out m4's search path issues in the near future...
patches gratefully accepted :-)
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 06:12:50PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
[...]
I was hoping to remove acinclude.m4 and use m4_include in aclocal.m4 by
switching to CVS automake, but currently the contents are still copied to
aclocal.m4 if they are not in the same directory as
ries to be `outside the project' when it decides what to do about a
macro. aclocal doesn't currently collect macro traces from configure.ac, and
pasting the code from automake seemed like overkill.
Cheers,
Gary.
--
())_. Gary V. Vaughangary@(lilith.warpmail.net|gnu.or
Title: Picture 3
ULTRA-XXX FARMYARD ACTION!
It's fucking gross!
Live dirty chat with real cowgirls,
Illustrated barnyard adventures .. and much more!
Visit
now!
Before the farmers take back their animals!
derstand how to do this a few years ago, but the memory has
faded. I do remember that I figured it out from the way TCL uses stub
tables on Windows, and some papers on the Scriptics site.
I'm sorry I can't remember any more details for you, but hope this is of
some help an
s for me.
Is there any way of achieving this with automake and libtool?
thanks.
Gary.
are picked
up ok, during a make however none of the cpp files are being picked up
even if I have run the compiler myself so they are sitting in the
directory before make is run.
Can anyone offer any assistance with this? I'm not a make expert by any
means and I'm very new to the autotools, any help is greatly appreciated.
thanks.
Gary.
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 03:59:29PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
>
> I don't think it is the job of Automake to run libtoolize when
> autoreconf IMHO.
>
> I'm in favor of removing this.
Agreed.
--
())_. Gary V. Vaughan gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org)
( &#x
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 08:06:53AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Raja R Harinath wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > On Mon, 15 Oct 2001, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> > >> On Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 10:03:38PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTE
your
Makefile.am.
HTH,
Gary.
--
())_. Gary V. Vaughan gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org)
( '/ Research Scientist http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk ,_())
/ )= GNU Hacker http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool \' `&
`(_~)_ Tech' Author
ory not found
Cheers,
Gary.
--
())_. Gary V. Vaughan gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org)
( '/ Research Scientist http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk ,_())
/ )= GNU Hacker http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool \' `&
`(_~)_ Tech' Authorhttp://sources.redhat.com/autobook =`---d__/
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 04:58:39AM -0700, Bruce Korb wrote:
> "Gary V. Vaughan" wrote:
>
> > Ah, okay. I thought you meant AutoGen was hosed.
>
> It is, too. First, "snprintfv/config/depcomp" couldn't be found during
> a "make distcheck&
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
