Re: Defining an arbitary value for one output only

2002-06-02 Thread Michael Still
On 2 Jun 2002, Richard Boulton wrote: > On Sun, 2002-06-02 at 09:01, Michael Still wrote: > > My Makefile.am looks something like: > > > > noinst_PROGRAMS = sample ui > > sample_SOURCES = sample.c > > ui_SOURCES = ui.c other.c sample.c > > > > I wo

Defining an arbitary value for one output only

2002-06-02 Thread Michael Still
to use... Can I have a hint please? Thanks, Mikal -- Michael Still ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) UMT+10hrs

Re: A better patch(1)

2001-05-08 Thread Michael Still
there. It displays the two code versions in X, and highlights what has changed (which should make the ' obvious). Checkout http://www.ozlabs.org Mikal -- Michael Still ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.stillhq.com -- a whole bunch of Open Source stuff including PDF software... &q

Re: Package support (RPM, deb, pkg, kits, etc.)

2001-01-13 Thread Michael Still
On 13 Jan 2001, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Jan 12, 2001, Michael Still <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Why don;t you just have some different primaries? > > The issue is not about having different programs depending on the > packaging tool. It's about creatin

Re: Package support (RPM, deb, pkg, kits, etc.)

2001-01-12 Thread Michael Still
Why don;t you just have some different primaries? Like, for instance: rpm_PROGRAMS = foo foo_SOURCES = foo.c wibble.c hamster.c I guess this means if you want a DEB as well, then you would have: deb_PROGRAMS = foo Cheers, Mikal PS: Nice book, I might one day finish reading it if I can find the