Re: What version of autoconf is required for automake-1.4f?

12:38 am, Clark Rawlins wrote: > > Tom, > > > > Thank you for your help. I am sorry if these questions are FAQs if > > so please direct me to the appropriate documentation. > > http://sources.redhat.com/autobook > > > After installing automake-2.14f in /us

Re: What version of autoconf is required for automake-1.4f?

Tom, Thank you for your help. I am sorry if these questions are FAQs if so please direct me to the appropriate documentation. After installing automake-2.14f in /usr/local I am getting an error messages when running aclocal: aclocal: configure.in: 10: macro `AM_PROG_LIBTOOL' not found in libra

Re: What version of autoconf is required for automake-1.4f?

Thanks Tom, Is autoconf (v 2.13) installed in /usr compatible with automake 2.14f installed in /usr/local? Clark On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 06:47:34PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Clark" == Clark Rawlins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Clark>

What version of autoconf is required for automake-1.4f?

The subject says it all. Clark PGP signature

Re: The %.o: %.cc rule

Tom, Thanks for the guidance so far. I got automake and autoconf out of cvs and did ./configure --prefix=$HOME make test install on both projects autoconf first then automake and now I get some errors when I run aclocal and automake. %aclocal aclocal: configure.in: 10: macro `AM_PROG_LIBTOOL

Re: The %.o: %.cc rule

On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 05:15:22PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Clark" == Clark Rawlins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Clark> Is there any kind of consensus on what would be the 'correct' > Clark> way to do this in automake? Is

Re: The %.o: %.cc rule

On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 11:03:23PM -0400, Harlan Stenn wrote: > > Besides the reason that it's not nessasary are there any reasons why > > the automake inference rules for C and C++ don't use -o ? > > > > I seem to remember that some compilers don't accept -o is this correct? > > Yes. Some olde

The %.o: %.cc rule

Besides the reason that it's not nessasary are there any reasons why the automake inference rules for C and C++ don't use -o ? I seem to remember that some compilers don't accept -o is this correct? If so what is the typical way of dealing with the lack of -o when you want it? PGP signature

libdir = @libdir@ => libdir = $(shell pwd)

Greetings, When I went to generate my Makefile using configure I expected that my libdir variable would be set to ${prefix}/lib not $(shell pwd). What is going on? What other information is relavant? Is this the right place to ask? Is there some documentation I missed? Clark PGP signature