On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 05:15:22PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Clark" == Clark Rawlins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Clark> Is there any kind of consensus on what would be the 'correct'
> Clark> way to do this in automake? Is there a consensus that automake
> Clark> should continue to support these old compilers?
>
> Yes, automake should support these old compilers. That is, until we
> find that they don't exist any more. That day could even be now.
>
> Anyway, automake already supports this via the `compile' script. Here
> is a comment from the script:
>
> # Wrapper for compilers which do not understand `-c -o'.
Does this mean that automake users can use -c and -o together and this
`compile' script will `do the right thing'?
>
> This is the current cvs automake.
>
> Clark> I am attempting to modify automake to support paths and want
> Clark> the output files to end up in the same directory structure as
> Clark> the original files.
>
> What do you mean by this?
> My guess is that the current automake already does what you want.
I want to be able to do something like:
test_SOURCES = d1/s1.cc d2/s2.cc
Clark
>
> Tom
PGP signature
