Hi,
On 11.11.2014 22:02, fr33domlover wrote:
>> If they are distributed, the distcheck target should not complain,
>> because it should expect the files to be there.
> The files are not specified in any variable with 'dist_' prefix. They are
> distributed because I wrote a dist-hook. Normally I
On 2014-11-11
Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11.11.2014 21:07, fr33domlover wrote:
>
> >> When the files are distributed, the "distcheck" should recognize that
> >> these belong in the source package, and not show an error.
>
> > Hmmm I think I didn't make myself clear. So just to make sure
Hi,
On 11.11.2014 21:07, fr33domlover wrote:
>> When the files are distributed, the "distcheck" should recognize that
>> these belong in the source package, and not show an error.
> Hmmm I think I didn't make myself clear. So just to make sure, before I cause
> confusion: The files are indeed di
On 2014-11-11
Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11.11.2014 18:50, fr33domlover wrote:
>
> > When I ran `make distcheck`, it failed because the HTML files don't get
> > cleaned by `make distclean`. That makes sense, but specifically for my
> > package this is not an error.
>
> If you assume tha
On 11/11/2014 10:59 AM, fr33domlover wrote:
>>> The first form of expansion on that page, $(var:.a=.b), should be OK.
>>> They are standard in POSIX and work on all make implementations that I
>>> know of.
>>>
>>> The version with % characters is not portable.
>>
>> That said, POSIX is hoping to s
Hi,
On 11.11.2014 18:50, fr33domlover wrote:
> When I ran `make distcheck`, it failed because the HTML files don't get
> cleaned
> by `make distclean`. That makes sense, but specifically for my package this is
> not an error.
If you assume that few people build these files, they should be
distr
On 2014-10-27
Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/27/2014 11:11 AM, Nick Bowler wrote:
> > On 2014-10-26 22:15 +0200, fr33domlover wrote:
> >> I'm a bit confused about all the expressive features and ways to use
> >> makefile variables, so just to be sure -
> >>
> >> http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual
Hello,
I have a package with code and a reference manual. The manual is rarely rebuilt
and requires several less usual tools (dot, doxygen, etc.) so I decided to put
the generated HTML files in MAINTAINERCLEANFILES and not DISTCLEANFILES.
When I ran `make distcheck`, it failed because the HTML fi
