On Sep 16, 2013, at 11:38 PM, Xochitl Lunde wrote:
>
> On Sep 16, 2013, at 4:52 PM, Nate Bargmann wrote:
>
>>> * On 2013 15 Sep 13:18 -0500, Jules Colding wrote:
>>
So, how do I tell the top-level Makefile.am that it should traverse all
sub-directories building only the libraries,
Jules Colding writes:
> Anyways, thanks for the advises. I'll read the paper on evil
> recursiveness and ponder what to do.
"Non-recursive make" is indeed a nice paradigm for various reasons,
but if you've read earlier threads on this list, actually
_implementing_ it is not quite that trivial.
Y
>From: automake-bounces+xochitl_lunde=tripplite@gnu.org
>[automake->bounces+xochitl_lunde=tripplite@gnu.org] on behalf of Jules
>Colding [cold...@venalicium.dk]
>Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 3:34 PM
>To: Nate Bargmann
>Cc: automake@gnu.org
>Su
On Sep 16, 2013, at 4:52 PM, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * On 2013 15 Sep 13:18 -0500, Jules Colding wrote:
>
>> So, how do I tell the top-level Makefile.am that it should traverse all
>> sub-directories building only the libraries, and then traverse the
>> sub-directories again building only the
* On 2013 15 Sep 13:18 -0500, Jules Colding wrote:
> So, how do I tell the top-level Makefile.am that it should traverse all
> sub-directories building only the libraries, and then traverse the
> sub-directories again building only the test applications?
Would it work to break the test program
On 09/15/2013 11:12 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Jules Colding wrote:
So, how do I tell the top-level Makefile.am that it should traverse all
sub-directories building only the libraries, and then traverse the
sub-directories again building only the test applic
