Re: library dependencies SUBDIR problem automake

2009-08-04 Thread Peter Johansson
Michiel Soede wrote: - non-recursive make, is that the same as just making one big make file that will always build everything? So I would loose the ability to build (for example) only one application, or library? You can always issue `make foo' if you wanna build `foo' only. - isn't there

Re: library dependencies SUBDIR problem automake

2009-08-04 Thread Michiel Soede
Hi John, Thanks for the fast reply (my mailtool messed up the line-feeds I guess, sorry about that). You were right about the wrong order in SUBDIRS = apps comps (that was a type). Your answers raised some new questions to me: - non-recursive make, is that the same as just making one big mak

Re: library dependencies SUBDIR problem automake

2009-08-04 Thread John Calcote
Hi Michiel, On 8/4/2009 10:01 AM, Michiel Soede wrote: Hi, I have a problem with dependencies to libraries in my build structure.the directory structure in my project is as follows (roughly): configure.acmakefile.amapps/ makefile.am app1/ main.cc ma

aclocal.m4 location

2009-08-04 Thread Sam Steingold
Hi, automake requires aclocal.m4 to be present in the current directory. this is not the case for me, I have one master aclocal.m4 and a few subprojects, each with its own Makefile.am and configure.in. this means that for automake to run, I have to create a temp symlynk for aclocal.m4 and then the

library dependencies SUBDIR problem automake

2009-08-04 Thread Michiel Soede
Hi, I have a problem with dependencies to libraries in my build structure.the directory structure in my project is as follows (roughly): configure.acmakefile.amapps/ makefile.am app1/ main.cc makefile.am comps/ makefile.am comp1