Re: InterScan NT Alert (bogus)

2002-04-21 Thread Allan Clark
Hey everyone; Off-topic, but I'm the [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I didn't generate this posting. > Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED] >[199.232.76.164]) > by chickenandporn.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) with ESMTP id g3LKi2kb004799 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 21 A

Miss --generate-deps

2002-04-21 Thread Paul Smith
GNU make used to use the automake --generate-deps option, which is now missing :(. The thing is, GNU make runs on a number of systems where it's not possible to run the configure script, etc. For the use of these systems, GNU make ships various pre-built makefiles, which are constructed from tem

Re: Autoconf speedup

2002-04-21 Thread Bruce Korb
Tom Tromey wrote: > libtool performance problems have to be dealt with in the libtool arena. > I don't think there's much automake can do about it. I think someone "intends" to deal with libtool performance by constructing a binary that replaces the 160K script. Something like what was done for:

InterScan NT Alert

2002-04-21 Thread postmaster
Sender, InterScan has detected virus(es) in your e-mail attachment. Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 15:46:40 -0500 (Central Daylight Time) Method: Mail From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> File: height.pif Action: deleted Virus: WORM_KLEZ.G

Re: make install not overwriting progname.conf

2002-04-21 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Rob" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Rob> Squid does something similar... Rob> sysconf_DATA = squid.conf.default Rob> install-data-local: install-sysconfDATA install-dataDATA Rob> [ ... ] This looks like a good approach. Note that you can use install-data-hook; a -hook will

Re: Autoconf speedup

2002-04-21 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Zdenek" == Zdenek Kabelac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Zdenek> I've been recieving lots of bugreports from automake1.6 users Zdenek> which appeared to be automake1.6 bugs. Please report them. We fixed a bunch of bugs for 1.6.1. Right now, based on user feedback, that seems to be a pretty

Re: Overriding of automake rules fails

2002-04-21 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Roger" == Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Roger> In a Makefile.am, we provide our own mostlyclean-aminfo rule, Roger> which is identical to the default except that the dvi and ps Roger> files are not removed. However, whilst this works with GNU Roger> make, Solaris make will still

Re: installing stripped kernel modules

2002-04-21 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Harlan" == Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Harlan> The strip options for programs are "too aggressive" for kernel Harlan> modules. Harlan> Some Makefile.am's will install both programs and kernel Harlan> modules. Harlan> What are the choices for altering the strip flags? You ha

Re: Chars different from [A-Za-z0-9_@]

2002-04-21 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Josef" == Josef Spillner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Josef> one of my applications is named r=E9pertoire. Josef> Automake chokes on r=E9pertoire_SOURCES and such. Try r_pertoire_SOURCES. I know this is a bit unsatisfactory. Josef> The system should adapt to the people and their language

newbie help

2002-04-21 Thread Marcel Janssen
Hi, I'm trying to learn autoconf/automake and while doing so I've had a look through some packages that use these tools. Rather than using autoconf/automake on my own source, I've first tried to strip all generated files from the existing package and try to generate new makefiles. The origina

Re: Two issues with automake

2002-04-21 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Paul" == Paul Smith writes: Paul> 1) I had a line like this in my configure.in: Paul> test -f somefile.in && AC_OUTPUT(somefile) Paul>This works fine with configure, but automake really doesn't like it: This may never work. Automake likes the outputs to be static. With the swi

(no subject)

2002-04-21 Thread Nobody
Subject: ¶¸´Ù ÀÎÅÍ³Ý Á߸ÅÀïÀÌ...[±¤°í] Return-Path: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: DreamMailingList Content-Type:text/html;charset=euc-kr