Tom Tromey wrote: > libtool performance problems have to be dealt with in the libtool arena. > I don't think there's much automake can do about it.
I think someone "intends" to deal with libtool performance by constructing a binary that replaces the 160K script. Something like what was done for: http://autogen.sf.net/fixinc.html I'm sure it will happen RSN, as soon as life stops interfering....;-) -- Bruce Korb <first initial + last name at gnu dot org> AG URL: http://autogen.sourceforge.net
