On Wednesday 23 May 2001 7:57 pm, Eric Siegerman wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 06:49:46PM +0100, Gary V . Vaughan wrote:
> > http://sources.redhat.com/autobook/autobook/autobook_43.html#SEC43
>
> (Minor typo on that page, btw: in "CVS does not preserve
> relatively timestamps", delete the "ly"
Once again, we interrupt your regularly scheduled posts with another news
flash:
I am proud to present patch release 2 from the automake-1.4 maintenance
branch. The main purpose of this release is to fix some irritating but small
bugs that remained in patch release 1. It is available now fro
> "Axel" == Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Axel> The request was for experience in making the
Axel> autoconf/automake/libtool set work with Borland C++.
Doing this would be fine from the automake perspective.
If the compiler is too different from a Unix compiler it might be
easiest t
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 05:46:49AM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2001, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > > may be there are some hints whether people have already tried with
> > > borland compilers.
> > Let's hope they are reading this list and will step forward to discuss it ;)
> sure - B
On 23 May 2001, Tom Tromey wrote:
> This is possible, but we don't recommend it. Instead we try to
> approach cross builds the "autoconf way": we assume that configure
> will use things like AC_CHECK_TOOL, etc.
Note that I'm writing of a performance. Install-sh is a serious
performance hit fo
On 23 May 2001, Tom Tromey wrote:
> I think this patch fixed the problem:
>
> 2001-05-17 Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * m4/depend.m4 (AM_DEPENDENCIES): If depcomp doesn't exist, revert
> to no dependency tracking.
>
> I'm guessing you forgot to run aclocal.
Nope, I have a
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > [...] may be there are some hints whether people have already tried with
> > borland compilers.
>
> Let's hope they are reading this list and will step forward to discuss it ;)
sure - Borland C is much faster, and checks for errors that gcc doesn't
both
Here's another bug which appears in 1.4-p1 as distributed by Debian.
The latest CVS release handles this problem differently. I believe
that the problem is fixed in the CVS release, but I'm not absolutely
positive.
It would be nice to get a fix in automake-1.4-p2.
Hi,
I tried the new automake
This bug is fixed in the CVS release, but it would be nice to have the
fix in 1.4-p2.
"Steve M. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I've switched to autoconf-2.50.
>
> After running "autoupdate" (it seemed like a good idea at the time), I
> discovered that automake 1.4 can't find an
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 01:43:59PM +0200, Guido Draheim wrote:
> I would recommended to use atleast gmake and (ba)sh which are both available
> for win/dos, and having the complete gnu fileutils is not a bad idea either.
Yes, as a first step I was considering cygwin as a solid basis for sh/perl
e
10 matches
Mail list logo
