Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL

2001-04-20 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 04:33:12PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote: > Tom> Do you think we should just rename the module? Or keep the name > Tom> and add a configure test? > > I think the former is much easier. > > Now the question is how will be install it? Do we try to get into > Perl's packagin

Re: More CVS head errors

2001-04-20 Thread Robert Collins
- Original Message - From: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2001 12:36 AM Subject: Re: More CVS head errors > > "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Robert> - Orig

Re: More CVS head errors

2001-04-20 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Robert> - Original Message - From: "Robert Collins" Robert> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Robert> Friday, April 20, 2001 9:35 AM Subject: More CVS head errors >> I know you love this bleeding edge feedback

Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL

2001-04-20 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Tom> Akim, I'm satisfied that we're ok distributing our own Tom> Class::Struct. Good! I will catch up soon then. Tom> Do you think we should just rename the module? Or keep the name Tom> and add a configure test? I think the former is muc

Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL

2001-04-20 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Richard" == Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Richard> I was sent a bunch of previous messages, which did not make Richard> it very clear who was saying what and why. I thought perhaps Richard> those words were the statement used on CPAN itself to say Richard> what the licenses

Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL

2001-04-20 Thread Richard Stallman
"Yes. With rare exception, the Perl distribution is covered by both the Artistic License or the GPL, whichever is more appropriate for your needs and it doesn't sound like you would be in conflict with either of them." These are the words that were not clear--they say that exceptions

Re: Bug when specifying --disable-dependency-tracking (AM_DEP_TRACK)

2001-04-20 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Apr 18, 2001, Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > .c.o: > source='$<' object='$@' libtool=no @AMDEPBACKSLASH@ > depfile='$(DEPDIR)/$*.Po' tmpdepfile='$(DEPDIR)/$*.TPo' > @AMDEPBACKSLASH@ > $(CCDEPMODE) $(depcomp) @AMDEPBACKSLASH@ > $(COMPILE) -c -o $@ `test -f $<