On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 04:33:12PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
> Tom> Do you think we should just rename the module? Or keep the name
> Tom> and add a configure test?
>
> I think the former is much easier.
>
> Now the question is how will be install it? Do we try to get into
> Perl's packagin
- Original Message -
From: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2001 12:36 AM
Subject: Re: More CVS head errors
> > "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>
> Robert> - Orig
> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robert> - Original Message - From: "Robert Collins"
Robert> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent:
Robert> Friday, April 20, 2001 9:35 AM Subject: More CVS head errors
>> I know you love this bleeding edge feedback
> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom> Akim, I'm satisfied that we're ok distributing our own
Tom> Class::Struct.
Good! I will catch up soon then.
Tom> Do you think we should just rename the module? Or keep the name
Tom> and add a configure test?
I think the former is muc
> "Richard" == Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Richard> I was sent a bunch of previous messages, which did not make
Richard> it very clear who was saying what and why. I thought perhaps
Richard> those words were the statement used on CPAN itself to say
Richard> what the licenses
"Yes. With rare exception, the Perl distribution is covered by both the
Artistic License or the GPL, whichever is more appropriate for your needs
and it doesn't sound like you would be in conflict with either of them."
These are the words that were not clear--they say that exceptions
On Apr 18, 2001, Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> .c.o:
> source='$<' object='$@' libtool=no @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
> depfile='$(DEPDIR)/$*.Po' tmpdepfile='$(DEPDIR)/$*.TPo'
> @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
> $(CCDEPMODE) $(depcomp) @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
> $(COMPILE) -c -o $@ `test -f $<