Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL

2001-04-19 Thread Tom Tromey
I removed cpan from the CC ilst. rms> Does "no license changes" mean that the modified version is also rms> released with notices saying "dual Artistic | GPL"? In that rms> case, the situation seems perfectly explicit and clear. Akim, I'm satisfied that we're ok distributing our own Class::Stru

Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL

2001-04-19 Thread Elaine -HFB- Ashton
Richard Stallman [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth: *> *>Does "no license changes" mean that the modified version is also *>released with notices saying "dual Artistic | GPL"? *>In that case, the situation seems perfectly explicit and clear. Yes, and I'll quote from a message sent a week ago to the same

Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL

2001-04-19 Thread Richard Stallman
That I can answer: Dean Roehrich, then called Class::Template, license Perl 5's dual Artistic/GPL (as it was contributed directly to Perl's core as a standard module). Later renamed to Class::Struct and modified by Jim Miner, then Damian Conway (the damian of the CC list), the

patch: missing uninstall-am target breaks non-gnu make

2001-04-19 Thread Robert Collins
This is just a patch for the fix suggested to me. Rob openbsduninstall.patch

Re: More CVS head errors

2001-04-19 Thread Robert Collins
- Original Message - From: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 9:35 AM Subject: More CVS head errors > I know you love this bleeding edge feedback :] > > What could cause errors like > Automake::register_language() called too early to

Re: problem: multiple definitions

2001-04-19 Thread Robert Collins
- Original Message - From: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 1:06 AM Subject: Re: problem: multiple definitions > > "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Robert> 2)

More CVS head errors

2001-04-19 Thread Robert Collins
I know you love this bleeding edge feedback :] What could cause errors like Automake::register_language() called too early to check prototype at /bin/automake line 742. (which is register_language ('name' => 'c', 'ansi' => '1', 'autodep' => '',

Re: Bad dependencies generation

2001-04-19 Thread Paul F. Kunz
To answer my own question about bad dependency generation with the combination of Red Hat 7.1beta, gcc 2.96, and autoconf/automake released version. It is gcc 2.96 causing the problem, as it went away after installing gcc 2.95.3.

Re: possible bug with depcomp

2001-04-19 Thread Derek R. Price
Akim Demaille wrote: > > "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Robert> The project I'm converting to automake uses > Robert> AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR(cfgaux). The dependency cehcking code was > Robert> looking for depend in the srcdir, not the srcdir/cfgaux. I'm > Robert> using

Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL

2001-04-19 Thread Elaine -HFB- Ashton
Richard Stallman [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth: *> *>Someone pointed out that the statement of CPAN policy could be made *>more explicit by changing a couple of words. If you are one of the *>maintainers of CPAN, would you please raise the idea? This has been on our FAQ for over a year now. http://w

Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL

2001-04-19 Thread Elaine -HFB- Ashton
Richard Stallman [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth: *> *>Someone pointed out that the statement of CPAN policy could be made *>more explicit by changing a couple of words. If you are one of the *>maintainers of CPAN, would you please raise the idea? This has been on our FAQ for over a year now. http://w